The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Screening for Traumatic Brain Injury in Troops Returning From Deployment in Afghanistan and Iraq: Initial Investigation of the Usefulness of a Short Screening Tool for Traumatic Brain Injury
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Preliminary assessment of a new instrument, the Brief Traumatic Brain Injury Screen (BTBIS). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of 596 soldiers returning from Iraq and/or Afghanistan, comparing the consistency of their reports of traumatic brain injury (TBI) across instruments with similar TBI questions, and in a brief follow-up interview. SETTING: Military base. MEASURES: Self-reported probable TBI on the BTBIS and on 2 longer questionnaires, and a brief follow-up interview. RESULTS: Self-reports of probable TBI were higher on the BTBIS, than on the longer instruments. Participants who screened positive on the BTBIS generally provided consistent information about probable TBI in the follow-up interview. CONCLUSIONS: In this initial study, the BTBIS demonstrated promise as part of a triage process in mass casualty situations, permitting individuals with probable TBI to self-report injury and continued symptoms. Further study, including full validation and reliability assessment, is warranted and required before these screening tools can be fully evaluated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Definition of mild traumatic brain injury
&NA;, &. (1993) · Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/00001199-199309000-00010 · Cited by 1,910
Initial Reliability and Validity of the Ohio State University TBI Identification Method
Corrigan, J. D., & Bogner, J. (2007) · Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/01.htr.0000300227.67748.77 · Cited by 816
Incidence of mild and moderate brain injury in the United States, 1991
D. M. SOSIN, J. E. S. (1996) · Brain Injury · doi:10.1080/026990596124719 · Cited by 594
Cited by
Mild traumatic brain injury in U.S. soldiers returning from Iraq
Hoge, C. W., McGurk, D., Thomas, J. L., Cox, A. L., Engel, C. C., & Castro, C. A. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa072972 · Cited by 2,775
Recommendations for the Use of Common Outcome Measures in Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Wilde, E. A., Whiteneck, G. G., Bogner, J., Bushnik, T., Cifu, D. X., Dikmen, S., French, L., Giacino, J. T., Hart, T., Malec, J. F., et al. (2010) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2010.06.033 · Cited by 461
Brenner, L. A., Vanderploeg, R. D., & Terrio, H. (2009) · Rehabilitation Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0016908 · Cited by 196
Walker, W. C., Cifu, D. X., Hudak, A. M., Goldberg, G., Kunz, R. D., & Sima, A. P. (2015) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2014.3433 · Cited by 97
Vincent, A. S., Roebuck-Spencer, T., Gilliland, K., & Schlegel, R. (2012) · Military Medicine · doi:10.7205/milmed-d-11-00289 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Schwab, K. A., Ivins, B., Cramer, G., Johnson, W., Sluss-Tiller, M., Kiley, K., Lux, W., & Warden, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
- Published
- 2007-11
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 377-389
- ISSN
- 0885-9701 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2064621949
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.