Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 511

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dysfunctional Tear Syndrome: A Delphi Approach to Treatment Recommendations

Behrens, Ashley, Doyle, John J, Stern, Lee, Chuck, Roy S, McDonnell, Peter J, Azar, Dimitri T, Dua, Harminder S, Hom, Milton, Karpecki, Paul M, Laibson, Peter R, Lemp, Michael A, Meisler, David M, Castillo, Juan Murube del, O’Brien, Terrence P, Pflugfelder, Stephen C, Rolando, Maurizio, Schein, Oliver D, Seitz, Berthold, Tseng, Scheffer C, Setten, Gysbert van, Wilson, Steven E, Yiu, Samuel C·2006·Cornea

Abstract

Purpose: To develop current treatment recommendations for dry eye disease from consensus of expert advice. Methods: Of 25 preselected international specialists on dry eye, 17 agreed to participate in a modified, 2-round Delphi panel approach. Based on available literature and standards of care, a survey was presented to each panelist. A two-thirds majority was used for consensus building from responses obtained. Treatment algorithms were created. Treatment recommendations for different types and severity levels of dry eye disease were the main outcome. Results: A new term for dry eye disease was proposed: dysfunctional tear syndrome (DTS). Treatment recommendations were based primarily on patient symptoms and signs. Available diagnostic tests were considered of secondary importance in guiding therapy. Development of algorithms was based on the presence or absence of lid margin disease and disturbances of tear distribution and clearance. Disease severity was considered the most important factor for treatment decision-making and was categorized into 4 levels. Severity was assessed on the basis of tear substitute requirements, symptoms of ocular discomfort, and visual disturbance. Clinical signs present in lids, tear film, conjunctiva, and cornea were also used for categorization of severity. Consensus was reached on treatment algorithms for DTS with and without concurrent lid disease. Conclusion: Panelist opinion relied on symptoms and signs (not tests) for selection of treatment strategies. Therapy is chosen to match disease severity and presence versus absence of lid margin disease or tear distribution and clearance disturbances.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.ico.0000214802.40313.fa

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Cited by

See all 511

Metadata

Authors
Behrens, A., Doyle, J. J., Stern, L., Chuck, R. S., McDonnell, P. J., Azar, D. T., Dua, H. S., Hom, M., Karpecki, P. M., Laibson, P. R., Lemp, M. A., Meisler, D. M., Castillo, J. M. D., O’Brien, T. P., Pflugfelder, S. C., Rolando, M., Schein, O. D., Seitz, B., Tseng, S. C., Setten, G. V., Wilson, S. E., & Yiu, S. C.
Venue
Cornea
Published
2006-09
Volume
25
Issue
8
Pages
900-907
ISSN
0277-3740 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2150621857
Cited by
511
References
25
FWCI
18.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dysfunctional Tear Syndrome: A Delphi Approach to Treatment Recommendations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ico.0000214802.40313.fa
The paper
Behrens, A., Doyle, J. J., Stern, L., Chuck, R. S., McDonnell, P. J., Azar, D. T., Dua, H. S., Hom, M., Karpecki, P. M., Laibson, P. R., Lemp, M. A., Meisler, D. M., Castillo, J. M. D., O’Brien, T. P., Pflugfelder, S. C., Rolando, M., Schein, O. D., Seitz, B., Tseng, S. C., . . . Yiu, S. C. (2006). Dysfunctional Tear Syndrome: A Delphi Approach to Treatment Recommendations. Cornea. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ico.0000214802.40313.fa

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.