The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Report from a WHO Working Group: standard method for detecting upper respiratory carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Numerous studies evaluating the efficacy of conjugate pneumococcal vaccines are being conducted or planned throughout the world. Some of these studies are evaluating the effect of vaccine on nasopharyngeal (NP) carriage. METHODS: The World Health Organization established a Working Group comprised of representatives from these trials and other NP colonization experts to establish core, standardized methods for the study of pneumococcal NP colonization that could be used in these trials. The intent was to reduce or eliminate variability in key methods which themselves could contribute to variability of observed pneumococcal NP colonization. In this way variability of vaccine effects between trials on NP colonization could more easily be analyzed for population or vaccine differences without the confounding effect caused by differences in study methodology. RESULTS: This paper presents the evidence base supporting the need for standardized NP colonization study methods, the methods themselves (Core Consensus Methods), including collection techniques, culture media, equipment, serotyping, storage of specimens and transport of isolates agreed on by the Working Group as well as a discussion of research priorities. CONCLUSIONS: The Core Consensus Methods provide a common methodology to conduct pneumococcal NP colonization studies with minimum interstudy method variability. The intention is to allow more meaningful comparisons of study results from conjugate pneumococcal vaccine trials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Serotype replacement in disease after pneumococcal vaccination
Weinberger, D. M., Malley, R., & Lipsitch, M. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)62225-8 · Cited by 1,020
Stearns, J. C., Davidson, C. J., McKeon, S., Whelan, F. J., Fontes, M. E., Schryvers, A. B., Bowdish, D. M. E., Kellner, J. D., & Surette, M. G. (2015) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2014.250 · Cited by 234
Vu, H. T. T., Yoshida, L. M., Suzuki, M., Nguyen, H. A. T., Nguyen, C. D. L., Nguyen, A. T. T., Oishi, K., Yamamoto, T., Watanabe, K., Vu, T. D., et al. (2011) · Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal · doi:10.1097/inf.0b013e3181f111a2 · Cited by 208
van den Bergh, M. R., Biesbroek, G., Rossen, J. W. A., de Steenhuijsen Piters, W. A. A., Bosch, A. A. T. M., van Gils, E. J. M., Wang, X., Boonacker, C. W. B., Veenhoven, R. H., Bruin, J. P., et al. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047711 · Cited by 208
Abdullahi, O., Nyiro, J., Lewa, P., Slack, M., & Scott, J. A. G. (2008) · Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal · doi:10.1097/inf.0b013e31814da70c · Cited by 168
Metadata
- Authors
- O’BRIEN, K. L., & NOHYNEK, H.
- Venue
- The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
- Published
- 2003-02
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e1-e11
- ISSN
- 0891-3668 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2043801100
- Cited by
- 396
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Report from a WHO Working Group: standard method for detecting upper respiratory carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.inf.0000049347.42983.77
- The paper
- O’BRIEN, K. L., & NOHYNEK, H. (2003). Report from a WHO Working Group: standard method for detecting upper respiratory carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.inf.0000049347.42983.77
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.