Cited by 21Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsPatient Safety and Medication ErrorsClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control

Diagnostic Errors and Abnormal Diagnostic Tests Lost to Follow-Up: A Source of Needless Waste and Delay to Treatment

Wahls, Terry·2007·Journal of Ambulatory Care Management

Abstract

Diagnostic errors are an important and often underappreciated source of medical error, needless delays to treatment, and needlessly wasted resources. Almost 65% of diagnostic errors have an important contribution of system errors, of which many are an abnormal test result that was lost to follow-up, that is, missed results. These system problems that contribute to missed results may represent low-hanging fruit for those who wish to reduce diagnostic errors in their institution. The rate of missed results and associated treatment delay are discussed. The system factors and human factors that contribute to these errors are discussed along with strategies that can be adopted to reduce these errors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.jac.0000290402.89284.a9

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wahls, T.
Affiliations
University of Iowa (US)
Corresponding author
Wahls, Terry
Venue
Journal of Ambulatory Care Management
Published
2007-10
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
338-343
ISSN
0148-9917 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2312308362
Cited by
21
References
26
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Ambulatory Care Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Keywords
diagnostic errors, loss to follow-up, system errors, human factors, treatment delay, medical errors, outpatient care
MeSH terms
Ambulatory Care, Continuity of Patient Care, Diagnostic Errors, Diagnostic Tests, Routine, Humans, Quality of Health Care, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review