The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Situation-Specific Theory of Heart Failure Self-care
Abstract
Heart failure, a common syndrome in developed countries worldwide, is associated with poor quality of life, frequent rehospitalizations, and early death. Self-care is essential to improving outcomes in this patient population. The purpose of this article is to describe a situation-specific theory of heart failure self-care in which self-care is defined as a naturalistic decision-making process involving the choice of behaviors that maintain physiologic stability (maintenance) and the response to symptoms when they occur (management). Self-care maintenance is further defined to encompass routine symptom monitoring and treatment adherence. Self-care management is characterized as a process initiated by symptom recognition and evaluation, which stimulates the use of self-care treatments and treatment evaluation. Confidence in self-care is thought to moderate and/or mediate the effect of self-care on various outcomes. Four propositions were derived from the self-care of heart failure conceptual model: (1) symptom recognition is the key to successful self-care management; (2) self-care is better in patients with more knowledge, skill, experience, and compatible values; (3) confidence moderates the relationship between self-care and outcomes; and (4) confidence mediates the relationship between self-care and outcomes. These propositions were tested and supported using data obtained in previous research. Support of these propositions provides early evidence for this situation-specific theory of heart failure self-care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-management education: History, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms
Lorig, K. R., & Holman, H. R. (2003) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1207/s15324796abm2601_01 · Cited by 4,094
Cited by
Processes of Self‐Management in Chronic Illness
Schulman‐Green, D., Jaser, S., Martin, F., Alonzo, A., Grey, M., McCorkle, R., Redeker, N. S., Reynolds, N., & Whittemore, R. (2012) · Journal of Nursing Scholarship · doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.2012.01444.x · Cited by 657
Effect of Patient Activation on Self-Management in Patients With Heart Failure
Shively, M. J., Gardetto, N. J., Kodiath, M. F., Kelly, A., Smith, T. L., Stepnowsky, C., Maynard, C., & Larson, C. B. (2013) · Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing · doi:10.1097/jcn.0b013e318239f9f9 · Cited by 203
Role of self-care in the patient with heart failure
Moser, D. K., Dickson, V., Jaarsma, T., Lee, C., Stromberg, A., & Riegel, B. (2012) · Current Cardiology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11886-012-0267-9 · Cited by 186
Self-citationHägglund, E., Lyngå, P., Frie, F., Ullman, B., Persson, H., Melin, M., & Hagerman, I. (2015) · Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal · doi:10.3109/14017431.2015.1035319 · Cited by 120
Psychological Determinants of Heart Failure Self-Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Kessing, D., Denollet, J., Widdershoven, J., & Kupper, N. (2016) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/psy.0000000000000270 · Cited by 113
Metadata
- Authors
- Riegel, B., & Dickson, V. V.
- Venue
- Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
- Published
- 2008-05
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 190-196
- ISSN
- 0889-4655 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2088987840
- Cited by
- 449
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Situation-Specific Theory of Heart Failure Self-care. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.jcn.0000305091.35259.85
- The paper
- Riegel, B., & Dickson, V. V. (2008). A Situation-Specific Theory of Heart Failure Self-care. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.jcn.0000305091.35259.85
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.