Cited by 657Nursing care and researchChronic Disease Management StrategiesDiabetes Management and Education

Processes of Self‐Management in Chronic Illness

Open access
Schulman‐Green, Dena, Jaser, Sarah, Martin, Faith, Alonzo, Angelo, Grey, Margaret, McCorkle, Ruth, Redeker, Nancy S., Reynolds, Nancy +1 more·2012·Journal of Nursing Scholarship

Abstract

Purpose: Self‐management is a dynamic process in which individuals actively manage a chronic illness. Self‐management models are limited in their specification of the processes of self‐management. The purpose of this article is to delineate processes of self‐management in order to help direct interventions and improve health outcomes for individuals with a chronic illness. Design: Qualitative metasynthesis techniques were used to analyze 101 studies published between January 2000 and April 2011 that described processes of self‐management in chronic illness. Methods: Self‐management processes were extracted from each article and were coded. Similar codes were clustered into categories. The analysis continued until a final categorization was reached. Findings: Three categories of self‐management processes were identified: focusing on illness needs; activating resources; and living with a chronic illness. Tasks and skills were delineated for each category. Conclusions: This metasynthesis expands on current descriptions of self‐management processes by specifying a more complete spectrum of self‐management processes. Clinical Relevance: Healthcare providers can best facilitate self‐management by coordinating self‐management activities, by recognizing that different self‐management processes vary in importance to patients over time, and by having ongoing communication with patients and providers to create appropriate self‐management plans.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2012.01444.x

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Preventing chronic conditions by promoting and enabling self-management is now widely regarded as critical to improving client outcomes and reducing demands on health systems.

    “Preventing chronic conditions by promoting and enabling self-management is now widely regarded as critical to improving client outcomes and reducing demands on health systems [6,7].”

    From Features of Structured, One-to-One Videoconference Interventions That Actively Engage People in the Management of Their Chronic Conditions: Scoping Review (2025) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Abstract (Clinical Relevance; page not provided) says chronic illness management is an important component of health care, and the Clinical Relevance section recommends provider support for self-management. The paper addresses managing existing illness, not preventing chronic conditions; the cited passages also do not establish that self-management reduces demands on health systems or improves client outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Self-management includes seeking support, making decisions, and altering behaviors in the context of everyday life.

    “This work, commonly termed self-management, includes seeking support, making decisions, and altering behaviors in the context of everyday life [6-8].”
  • Self-management programs are known to effectively improve health outcomes and reduce health system demands.

    “Self-management programs are known to effectively improve health outcomes and reduce health system demands [6,7].”

    From Features of Structured, One-to-One Videoconference Interventions That Actively Engage People in the Management of Their Chronic Conditions: Scoping Review (2025) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Self-Management of Chronic Illness section defines self-management, and Clinical Relevance discusses how providers can support it; neither reports that programs improve health outcomes or reduce health-system demands. A search for program effectiveness, health outcomes, and healthcare utilization found no passage in our copy establishing those effects. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schulman‐Green, D., Jaser, S., Martin, F., Alonzo, A., Grey, M., McCorkle, R., Redeker, N. S., Reynolds, N., & Whittemore, R.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Venue
Journal of Nursing Scholarship
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-05-02
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
136-144
ISSN
  • 0363-2792 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-6546
  • 1547-5069
OpenAlex
W1719199032
Cited by
657
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 3
FWCI
60.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Nursing Scholarship (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
  • UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service (K23 NK088454)
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (R21NR011387, P20NR0010674, P20NR010674, P30NR008999, R01NR006009)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K23DK088454)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024139)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
self-management, chronic disease, resource activation, living with chronic illness, self-management interventions, patient-provider communication
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Humans, Self Care, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review