Cited by 37Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorCardiac Health and Mental Health

Modulation of Hyperreactivity to 35% CO2 After One Week of Treatment With Paroxetine and Reboxetine: A Double-Blind, Randomized Study

Perna, Giampaolo, Bertani, Angelo, Caldirola, Daniela, Di Pasquale, Danila, Migliarese, Giovanni, Bellodi, Laura·2004·Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology

Abstract

The effects of short treatments (7 days) with paroxetine and with reboxetine on the reactivity to inhalations of 35% carbon dioxide (CO2)/65% oxygen (O2) were compared in 28 patients with Panic Disorder who had positive responses to 35% CO2 inhalations. A double-blind, randomized design was applied. Each patient was given the 35% CO2 challenge on days 0 (before starting the treatment) and 7. Anxiety reactivity to CO2 decreased significantly with both drugs but the decrease was significantly stronger in the group treated with paroxetine. The rate of patients whose reactivity has reduced of at least 50% after 7 days was significantly higher in the group treated with paroxetine (10/14, 71.5%) than in the one treated with reboxetine (3/14, 21.5%). These results indicate that the modulation of the serotonergic system is more relevant for CO2 hyperreactivity than the modulation of the noradrenergic one.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.jcp.0000125682.97466.3c

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A previous study by the authors' group showed that reboxetine was significantly less effective than paroxetine in decreasing the frequency of panic attacks induced by inhalation of 35% carbon dioxide/65% oxygen gas mixture in patients with panic disorder.

    “a previous study conducted by our group showed that reboxetine, a selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, was significantly less effective than paroxetine (an SSRI) in decreasing the frequency of PAs induced by inhalation of 35% carbon dioxide (CO2)/65% oxygen (O2) gas mixture in patients with PD [36].”

    From Management of Treatment-Resistant Panic Disorder (2017) · cites this paper as [36]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perna, G., Bertani, A., Caldirola, D., Di Pasquale, D., Migliarese, G., & Bellodi, L.
Affiliations
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT)
Corresponding author
Perna, Giampaolo
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology
Published
2004-06
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
277-282
ISSN
0271-0749 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1992554765
Cited by
37
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
panic disorder, paroxetine, reboxetine, serotonergic system, noradrenergic system
MeSH terms
Reboxetine, Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Carbon Dioxide, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Morpholines, Chi-Square Distribution, Bronchial Hyperreactivity, Panic Disorder, Paroxetine, Statistics, Nonparametric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review