Cited by 153Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesAging, Health, and DisabilityHealth and Well-being Studies

Social support and suicidal ideation in older adults using home healthcare services

Rowe, Jennifer L., Conwell, Yeates, Schulberg, Herbert C., Bruce, Martha L.·2006·The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective The objective of this study was to examine the associations between objective and subjective social support and suicidal ideation in older adults receiving home healthcare services.Method Participants were randomly selected from a sample of older adults newly starting skilled nursing care from a certified home health agency in Westchester County, NY. Research interviewers assessed 522 older adults aged 65 years and older who were receiving home care services. Subjective and objective components of social support were assessed using measures of social network, social interaction patterns, instrumental support, and perceptions of social support. Suicidal ideation was assessed using items from the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.Results In bivariate analyses, neither objectively determined size of social network nor instrumental support was associated with suicidal ideation. However, lower social interaction patterns and lower perceived social support were significantly related to suicidal ideation. After adjusting for potential confounders, only lower perceived support remained significantly associated with suicidal ideation. In post hoc analyses of the perceptions of social support scale items, satisfaction with one's relationships and feeling useful to family and friends were significantly associated with a lower likelihood of suicidal ideation in the final multivariate logistic regression model controlling for possible confounding variables.Conclusions Subjective social support is a potentially modifiable risk factor for suicide in later life. Findings suggest that the perception of social support is an important construct to examine in future longitudinal studies examining risk and protective factors for suicidal ideation and behaviors in older adults.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.jgp.0000218324.78202.25

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Seven studies (with eight publications) focused on death wishes/suicide ideation.

    “Seven studies (with eight publications) focused on death wishes/suicide ideation [27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34].”
  • Instrumental support did not differentiate older adults with and without death/suicide ideation.

    “Instrumental support did not differentiate older adults with and without death/suicide ideation [32].”
  • Limited social contact was associated with suicidal ideation in U.S. studies by Bartels and Rowe.

    “Several U.S. studies (n = 3) examined frequency of social contact, with studies by Bartels and Rowe documenting associations between limited social contact and suicidal ideation [28,32]”
  • Social network size in homecare patients was not associated with suicidal ideation in the Rowe study.

    “Rowe examined a single aspect of social integration—the size of the social network in homecare patients in the U.S.—and did not find an effect on suicidal ideation [32].”
  • Three of the five analyses of frequency of social contact (across 3 studies, all from the U.S.) yielded significant associations between low contact and both suicide ideation and suicide.

    “Three of the five analyses of frequency of social contact (across 3 studies, all from the U.S. [28,32,41]) yielded significant associations between low contact and both suicide ideation and suicide.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rowe, J. L., Conwell, Y., Schulberg, H. C., & Bruce, M. L.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Rowe, Jennifer L.
Venue
The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-09
Volume
14
Issue
9
Pages
758-766
ISSN
1064-7481 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054667081
Cited by
153
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 9
FWCI
7.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5t32mh020061-25)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (T32 MH20061, R24-MH64608, R24MH064608, T32-MH020061)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
Keywords
social support, suicidal ideation, older adults, home health care services, perceived social support, social interaction patterns, instrumental support, social networks, suicide risk factors, skilled nursing care, relationship satisfaction
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Catchment Area, Health, Demography, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Home Care Services, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, New York, Personal Satisfaction, Risk Factors, Social Support, Suicide, Attempted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review