Cited by 112Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesAging, Health, and DisabilityHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse

Suicidal ideation among elderly homecare patients

Raue, Patrick J., Meyers, Barnett S., Rowe, Jennifer L., Heo, Moonseong, Bruce, Martha L.·2007·International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

Objectives: To identify the prevalence, correlates, and one‐year naturalistic course of suicidal ideation in a representative sample of elderly adults newly admitted to visiting nurse homecare. Method: Five hundred and thirty‐nine participants (aged ≥65), newly initiating homecare for skilled nursing services, were interviewed with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM‐IV (SCID‐IV) and measures of depression severity, medical comorbidity, functional status, and social support. Participants were classified as having no suicidal ideation in the past month, passive ideation, active ideation, or active ideation with poor impulse control or suicide plan. Results: Fifty‐seven participants (10.6%) reported passive and six (1.2%) reported active suicidal ideation. Higher depression severity, greater medical comorbidity, and lower subjective social support were independently associated with the presence of any level of suicidal ideation. At one year, suicidal ideation persisted for 36.7% of those with ideation at baseline, and the incidence of suicide ideation was 5.4% Conclusions: The high prevalence, persistence, and incidence of suicidal ideation in medically ill home healthcare patients underscore the relevance of this population for suicide prevention efforts. The clinical and psychosocial factors associated with suicidal ideation in this underserved, high‐risk population are potentially modifiable, and thus useful targets for suicide prevention interventions. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gps.1649

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Seven studies (with eight publications) focused on death wishes/suicide ideation.

    “Seven studies (with eight publications) focused on death wishes/suicide ideation [27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34].”
  • No association with marital status was observed in U.S. homecare recipients with suicidal ideation.

    “no association with marital status was observed in a U.S. study conducted by Raue which examined suicidal ideation (passive/active/none) in recipients of in-home nursing [31].”
  • Living alone was not associated with suicide ideation in the Bartels, Raue, and Yen studies.

    “Further, no relationship was observed with suicide ideation in that study, which was also the case in the study by Raue [31], and the Yen study from Taiwan [34].”
  • Greater perceived social support was associated with lower risk for both concurrent and one-year incident death/suicide ideation.

    “However, greater perceived social support was associated with lower risk for both concurrent and one-year incident death/suicide ideation [31].”
  • Consistent results were found for subjective measures of social connectedness: perceived social support (two U.S. studies) and loneliness (two Swedish studies).

    “Though investigated in fewer studies, consistent results were also found for subjective measures of social connectedness—perceived social support (two U.S. studies [31,41]) and loneliness (two Swedish studies [39,40,42]).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raue, P. J., Meyers, B. S., Rowe, J. L., Heo, M., & Bruce, M. L.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
Raue, Patrick J.
Venue
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-09-05
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
32-37
ISSN
  • 0885-6230 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1166
OpenAlex
W2022312367
Cited by
112
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5t32mh020061-25)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R24-MH64608, R24MH064608, T32-MH020061, R01 MH 56482, K23MH069784, R01MH056482)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Keywords
suicidal ideation, older adults, home care, visiting nurses, depression severity, comorbidities, social support, suicide prevention, suicide planning, impulse control
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude to Death, Depressive Disorder, Female, Home Care Services, Humans, Male, New York, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Risk Factors, Social Support, Suicide, Attempted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review