Cited by 147Workplace Health and Well-beingOccupational Health and Safety in WorkplacesHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention

A Review and Analysis of the Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness Studies of Comprehensive Health Promotion and Disease Management Programs at the Worksite: Update VI 2000???2004

Pelletier, Kenneth R.·2005·Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

Abstract

This critical review focuses on the 12 new studies focused on the clinical and cost outcomes research focused on worksites and published between 2000 and 2004. Although these new studies indicate further evidence of positive clinical and cost outcomes, the quantity and quality of such research continue to decline. When corporations and health plans are demanding more evidence-based outcomes, this decline in rigorous research marks a serious challenge to the field of health promotion and disease management.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.jom.0000174303.85442.bf

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pelletier, K. R.
Affiliations
University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Pelletier, Kenneth R.
Venue
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Published
2005-10
Volume
47
Issue
10
Pages
1051-1058
ISSN
1076-2752 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4245979615
Cited by
147
References
30
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
Keywords
workplace health promotion, disease management programs, cost-effectiveness, clinical outcomes, evidence-based practice, research quality, employer-sponsored health programs, health plans
MeSH terms
Cost-Benefit Analysis, Health Promotion, Health Services Research, Humans, Occupational Health Services, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Workplace, Disease Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review