Cited by 249Workplace Health and Well-beingOccupational Health and Safety in WorkplacesHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention

A Review and Analysis of the Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness Studies of Comprehensive Health Promotion and Disease Management Programs at the Worksite: Update VII 2004–2008

Pelletier, Kenneth R.·2009·Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To conduct the seventh periodic review and analysis of the clinical and cost-effectiveness research conducted in worksite/corporate environments between 2004 and 2008. METHODS: A literature search of US-based research was conducted using a multistage process including MEDLINE, ADI, EDGAR, CARL, Inform, Lexis-Nexis, as well as direct inquiries to key researchers in this area of expertise. RESULTS: From 2004 to 2008, there were 16 new studies that met the Inclusion/Exclusion criteria. These studies are critiqued and entered into a data table consisting of 13 variables and citations of the 16 new studies. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical and cost-effectiveness research in the worksite/corporate environment continues to evolve although there was only one randomized clinical trial conducted during the most recent interval. There are innovations in pilot studies, quasi-experimental methodologies, and econometric modeling as indicative of future trends.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/jom.0b013e3181a7de5a

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 89 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pelletier, K. R.
Affiliations
University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Pelletier, Kenneth R.
Venue
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
Published
2009-07
Volume
51
Issue
7
Pages
822-837
ISSN
1076-2752 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074814503
Cited by
249
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 21
FWCI
4.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Johnson and Johnson
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
Keywords
workplace health promotion, corporate health programs, disease management programs, cost-effectiveness, clinical effectiveness, employer-sponsored health programs, randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental design, econometric models
MeSH terms
Cost-Benefit Analysis, Health Promotion, Humans, Research, Program Evaluation, Workplace, Disease Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review