Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 251

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Survival and Restoration of Pulmonary Perfusion in a Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients After Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Miniati, Massimo, Monti, Simonetta, Bottai, Matteo, Scoscia, Elvio, Bauleo, Carolina, Tonelli, Lucia, Dainelli, Alba, Giuntini, Carlo·2006·Medicine

Abstract

We followed prospectively 834 consecutive patients (70% inpatients), evaluated for suspected pulmonary embolism, for a median time of 2.1 years (range, 0-4.8 yr), and compared the survival rates in patients with proven pulmonary embolism (n=320) with those without (n=514). In multivariate analysis, we modeled the probability of surviving in patients with pulmonary embolism as a function of the extent of pulmonary vascular obstruction at baseline. Among patients with pulmonary embolism, a scintigraphic follow-up was pursued to assess the restoration of pulmonary perfusion over a 1-year period. We found that massive pulmonary embolism (vascular obstruction>or=50%) is a risk factor for mortality within the first few days after onset but, subsequently, has no significant effect on survival. The adjusted risk of death in patients with massive pulmonary embolism was 8-fold higher than in patients without embolism within the first day after the incident event. By contrast, the adjusted risk of death for patients with minor or moderate pulmonary embolism (vascular obstruction<50%) was no higher than in patients without embolism at any time after onset. Most of the patients who survived a year after pulmonary embolism showed a nearly complete restoration of pulmonary perfusion with a considerable improvement in arterial oxygenation. Four (1%) of the 320 patients with pulmonary embolism at presentation developed chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. These patients featured persistent large perfusion defects in sequential lung scans. Pulmonary embolism with vascular obstruction>or=50% is a strong, independent predictor of reduced short-term survival. This underscores the need for a prompt diagnosis of the disease. Monitoring the resolution of pulmonary embolism by lung scanning may prove useful in identifying patients with persistent perfusion abnormalities who may be at risk of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.md.0000236952.87590.c8

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 251

Metadata

Authors
Miniati, M., Monti, S., Bottai, M., Scoscia, E., Bauleo, C., Tonelli, L., Dainelli, A., & Giuntini, C.
Venue
Medicine
Published
2006-09
Volume
85
Issue
5
Pages
253-262
ISSN
0025-7974 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2078329863
Cited by
251
References
1
FWCI
7.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Survival and Restoration of Pulmonary Perfusion in a Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients After Acute Pulmonary Embolism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.md.0000236952.87590.c8
The paper
Miniati, M., Monti, S., Bottai, M., Scoscia, E., Bauleo, C., Tonelli, L., Dainelli, A., & Giuntini, C. (2006). Survival and Restoration of Pulmonary Perfusion in a Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients After Acute Pulmonary Embolism. Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.md.0000236952.87590.c8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.