Cited by 18Nasal Surgery and Airway StudiesObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchMedical Image Segmentation Techniques

Objective Computerized Determination of the Minimum Cross-Sectional Area of the Nasal Passage on Computed Tomography

Bakker, Niels H., Lohuis, Peter J. F. M., Menger, Dirk J., Trenit??, Gilbert J. Nolst, Fokkens, Wytske J., Grimbergen, Cornelis A.·2005·The Laryngoscope

Abstract

Objectives/hypothesis Current methods that measure cross-sectional areas of the nasal passage on computed tomography (CT) do not determine the minimum cross-sectional area that may be an important factor in nasal airway resistance. Objective measurement of the dimensions of the nasal passage may help in the diagnosis, as well as the choice and evaluation of surgical treatment for upper airway insufficiencies. Study design Retrospective and clinical study. Methods Software was developed that automatically calculates the minimum cross-sectional area of the nasal passage on CT. Results Evaluation shows that the minimization algorithm in the software reliably calculates the position and orientation of the oblique plane on which the minimum cross-section lies. Conclusion The developed method may be used for objective and observer-independent evaluation of surgical treatment options.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.mlg.0000174953.66679.a2

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Computational analysis of nasal fluid dynamics from simulations on computed tomography is expensive and still not widely used.

    “Other permeability assessment techniques, such as computational analysis of nasal fluid dynamics from simulations on computed tomography, are expensive and still not widely used [79,80].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bakker, N. H., Lohuis, P. J. F. M., Menger, D. J., Trenit??, G. J. N., Fokkens, W. J., & Grimbergen, C. A.
Affiliations
Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Lohuis, Peter J. F. M.
Venue
The Laryngoscope
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-10
Volume
115
Issue
10
Pages
1809-1812
ISSN
0023-852X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2133859439
Cited by
18
References
9
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Laryngoscope (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
Keywords
nasal passages, minimum cross-sectional area, nasal resistance, computed tomography, automated measurement software, upper airway obstruction, minimization algorithms
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Body Weights and Measures, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Nose, Paranasal Sinus Diseases, Retrospective Studies, Software, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Anatomy, Cross-Sectional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review