Cited by 455COVID-19 and Mental HealthDisaster Response and ManagementHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnout

Risk Perception and Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) on Work and Personal Lives of Healthcare Workers in Singapore: What Can We Learn?

Koh, David, Lim, Meng Kin, Chia, Sin Eng, Ko, Soo Meng, Qian, Feng, Ng, Vivian, Tan, Ban Hock, Wong, Kok Seng +10 more·2005·Medical Care

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Healthcare workers (HCWs) were at the frontline during the battle against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). Understanding their fears and anxieties may hold lessons for handling future outbreaks, including acts of bioterrorism. METHOD: We measured risk perception and impact on personal and work life of 15,025 HCWs from 9 major healthcare institutions during the SARS epidemic in Singapore using a self-administered questionnaire and Impact of Events Scale and analyzed the results with bivariate and multivariate statistics. RESULTS: From 10,511 valid questionnaires (70% response), we found that although the majority (76%) perceived a great personal risk of falling ill with SARS, they (69.5%) also accepted the risk as part of their job. Clinical staff (doctors and nurses), staff in daily contact with SARS patients, and staff from SARS-affected institutions expressed significantly higher levels of anxiety. More than half reported increased work stress (56%) and work load (53%). Many experienced social stigmatization (49%) and ostracism by family members (31%), but most (77%) felt appreciated by society. Most felt that the personal protective measures implemented were effective (96%) and that the institutional policies and protocols were clear (93%) and timely (90%). CONCLUSION: During epidemics, healthcare institutions have a duty to protect HCWs and help them cope with their personal fears and the very stressful work situation. Singapore's experience shows that simple protective measures based on sound epidemiological principles, when implemented in a timely manner, go a long way to reassure HCWs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.mlr.0000167181.36730.cc

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 21 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koh, D., Lim, M. K., Chia, S. E., Ko, S. M., Qian, F., Ng, V., Tan, B. H., Wong, K. S., Chew, W. M., Tang, H. K., Ng, W., Muttakin, Z., Emmanuel, S., Fong, N. P., Koh, G., Kwa, C. T., Tan, K. B.-C., & Fones, C.
Affiliations
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • National University Hospital (SG)
  • Singapore General Hospital (SG)
  • KK Women's and Children's Hospital (SG)
  • NHG Polyclinics (SG)
Corresponding author
  • Koh, David
  • Lim, Meng Kin
  • Chia, Sin Eng
  • Qian, Feng
  • Ng, Vivian
  • Fong, Ngan Phoon
Venue
Medical Care
Published
2005-07
Volume
43
Issue
7
Pages
676-682
ISSN
0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2031239563
Cited by
454
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 131 · 2020: 104 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
9.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Disaster Response and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Keywords
SARS, healthcare workers, risk perception, occupational anxiety, occupational stress, personal protective measures, social stigma, ostracism, work-life impact, infection control policy, bioterrorism preparedness
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Disease Outbreaks, Emotions, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Singapore, Logistic Models, Workload, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review