Cited by 175Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityTechnology Use by Older AdultsHealth Sciences Research and Education

Examining Health Information–Seeking Behaviors of Older Adults

Open access
CHAUDHURI, SHOMIR, LE, THAI, WHITE, CATHY, THOMPSON, HILAIRE, DEMIRIS, GEORGE·2013·CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing

Abstract

This study aims to examine which resources older adults utilize for their health information needs, how trustworthy and reliable they find these resources, and the difficulties they face in obtaining health-related information. A 41-item survey designed to understand the information-seeking characteristics of older adults was developed and distributed to retirement communities. Some items were taken from the Health Information National Trends Survey. Of 1520 surveys, 403 were returned completed (26.6%). Respondents' mean age was 77.65 years. Average scores indicated respondents trusted particular sources of health information in the following order (highest to lowest): health care providers, pharmacists, friends and relatives, retirement community staff, newspapers, the Internet, television, and the radio. In conclusion, older adults have a greater amount of trust in a person with whom they are able to actively discuss their health as opposed to a nonliving source, which they have to access or manipulate, such as the Internet. Efforts must be made to help older adults better navigate and utilize the Internet and recognize dependable online sources so that they may increase their trust in its use, thereby increasing satisfaction with their own ability to seek and use sources of health information.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.ncn.0000432131.92020.42

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
CHAUDHURI, S., LE, T., WHITE, C., THOMPSON, H., & DEMIRIS, G.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing
Published
2013-11
Volume
31
Issue
11
Pages
547-553
ISSN
1538-2931 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091918360
Cited by
175
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2
FWCI
9.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • CIN Computers Informatics Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
U.S. National Library of Medicine (T15LM007442)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
Keywords
health information seeking, older adults, trust in health information sources, health information needs, retirement communities, online health information, internet use by older adults, source reliability, healthcare workers, pharmacists
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, United States, Internet, Information Seeking Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review