Cited by 42Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

The Relationship Between Peritraumatic Distress and Peritraumatic Dissociation: An Examination of Two Competing Models

Fikretoglu, Deniz, Brunet, Alain, Best, Suzanne, Metzler, Thomas, Delucchi, Kevin, Weiss, Daniel S., Fagan, Jeffrey, Marmar, Charles·2006·Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease

Abstract

This study examined whether peritraumatic dissociation serves to protect trauma-exposed individuals from experiencing high levels of peritraumatic distress or is an epiphenomenon of high levels of peritraumatic distress. The sample was comprised of 709 police officers and 317 peer-nominated civilians exposed to a variety of critical incidents. Participants filled out measures of trauma exposure, traumatic stress, peritraumatic distress, and peritraumatic dissociation. There was an overall moderate-to-strong linear relationship between peritraumatic distress and dissociation. Among those with high levels of dissociation, very few reported low levels of distress. Among those with high levels of distress, a significant number--but not all--reported high levels of dissociation. Our results do not provide support for the idea that dissociation protects individuals from experiencing high levels of distress at the time of the trauma but rather suggest that dissociation is an epiphenomenon of high levels of distress observed in a subset of individuals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.nmd.0000244563.22864.f1

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fikretoglu, D., Brunet, A., Best, S., Metzler, T., Delucchi, K., Weiss, D. S., Fagan, J., & Marmar, C.
Affiliations
  • Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA)
  • San Francisco VA Medical Center (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Fikretoglu, Deniz
  • Brunet, Alain
Venue
Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease
Published
2006-11
Volume
194
Issue
11
Pages
853-858
ISSN
0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075864685
Cited by
42
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH-56350, R01MH056350)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
peritraumatic distress, peritraumatic dissociation, traumatic stress, trauma exposure, critical incidents, police officers, civilian population, epiphenomenon
MeSH terms
Adult, Defense Mechanisms, Diagnosis, Differential, Dissociative Disorders, Female, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Stress, Psychological, Police, Law Enforcement, Stress Disorders, Traumatic, Acute

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review