The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The 2019 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma
Open accessAbstract
Five years after the last prostatic carcinoma grading consensus conference of the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP), accrual of new data and modification of clinical practice require an update of current pathologic grading guidelines. This manuscript summarizes the proceedings of the ISUP consensus meeting for grading of prostatic carcinoma held in September 2019, in Nice, France. Topics brought to consensus included the following: (1) approaches to reporting of Gleason patterns 4 and 5 quantities, and minor/tertiary patterns, (2) an agreement to report the presence of invasive cribriform carcinoma, (3) an agreement to incorporate intraductal carcinoma into grading, and (4) individual versus aggregate grading of systematic and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging–targeted biopsies. Finally, developments in the field of artificial intelligence in the grading of prostatic carcinoma and future research perspectives were discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep learning as a tool for increased accuracy and efficiency of histopathological diagnosis
Litjens, G., Sánchez, C. I., Timofeeva, N., Hermsen, M., Nagtegaal, I., Kovacs, I., Hulsbergen - van de Kaa, C., Bult, P., van Ginneken, B., & van der Laak, J. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep26286 · Cited by 1,069
Self-citationStröm, P., Kartasalo, K., Olsson, H., Solorzano, L., Delahunt, B., Berney, D. M., Bostwick, D. G., Evans, A. J., Grignon, D. J., Humphrey, P. A., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30738-7 · Cited by 620
Self-citation
Cited by
Epstein, J. I., Allsbrook, W. C., Amin, M. B., & Egevad, L. L. (2005) · American Journal of Surgical Pathology · doi:10.1097/01.pas.0000173646.99337.b1 · Cited by 2,763
Engineering clinical translation of OGSE diffusion MRI
Zhu, A., Michael, E. S., Li, H., Sprenger, T., Hua, Y., Lee, S., Yeo, D. T. B., McNab, J. A., Hennel, F., Fieremans, E., et al. (2025) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.30510 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- van Leenders, G. J. L. H., van der Kwast, T. H., Grignon, D. J., Evans, A. J., Kristiansen, G., Kweldam, C. F., Litjens, G., McKenney, J. K., Melamed, J., Mottet, N., Paner, G. P., Samaratunga, H., Schoots, I. G., Simko, J. P., Tsuzuki, T., Varma, M., Warren, A. Y., Wheeler, T. M., Williamson, S. R., & Iczkowski, K. A.
- Venue
- American Journal of Surgical Pathology
- Published
- 2020-05-26
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- e87-e99
- ISSN
- 0147-5185 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4214806444
- Cited by
- 713
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 37.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The 2019 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/pas.0000000000001497
- The paper
- van Leenders, G. J. L. H., van der Kwast, T. H., Grignon, D. J., Evans, A. J., Kristiansen, G., Kweldam, C. F., Litjens, G., McKenney, J. K., Melamed, J., Mottet, N., Paner, G. P., Samaratunga, H., Schoots, I. G., Simko, J. P., Tsuzuki, T., Varma, M., Warren, A. Y., Wheeler, T. M., Williamson, S. R., & Iczkowski, K. A. (2020). The 2019 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. American Journal of Surgical Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1097/pas.0000000000001497
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
