Cited by 56Eating Disorders and BehaviorsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Application of Exposure Therapy and D-Cycloserine to the Treatment of Anorexia Nervosa: A Preliminary Trial

Open access

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Novel approaches to the treatment of anorexia nervosa (AN) are needed. This preliminary study examined the utility and safety of an exposure therapy intervention and D-cycloserine (DCS) in a population of patients with AN. METHOD: Eleven participants completed a series of 6 laboratory meals, including pre- and post-exposure test meals and four exposure sessions. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either DCS or placebo in double-blind fashion before each of the 4 exposure sessions. These results were compared to data from a previously studied group of patients who received treatment as usual. RESULTS: Total caloric intake increased significantly from the baseline meal session to the post-test meal session in the patients who received the exposure therapy intervention. Caloric intake did not increase significantly in the comparison group. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that an exposure therapy intervention specifically focused on meal consumption may be helpful in increasing intake of a test meal.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.pra.0000281484.89075.a8

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 25 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 56

Metadata

Authors
STEINGLASS, J., SYSKO, R., SCHEBENDACH, J., BROFT, A., STROBER, M., & WALSH, B. T.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Venue
Journal of Psychiatric Practice
Published
2007-07
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
238-245
ISSN
  • 1527-4160 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-1145
OpenAlex
W2104200966
Cited by
56
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatric Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH65024, K23MH076195, T32MH15144, R01MH082736, R21MH065024, T32MH015144)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
anorexia nervosa, exposure therapy, D-cycloserine, energy intake, meal ingestion, treatment-resistant eating disorders
MeSH terms
Adult, Anorexia Nervosa, Anxiety Disorders, Energy Intake, Combined Modality Therapy, Cycloserine, Desensitization, Psychologic, Double-Blind Method, Eating, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Pain Measurement, Patient Admission, Body Mass Index, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Excitatory Amino Acid Agonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review