The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effect of Different Wound Dressings on Cell Viability and Proliferation
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many new dressings have been developed since the early 1980s. Wound healing comprises cleansing, granulation/vascularization, and epithelialization phases. An optimum microenvironment and the absence of cytotoxic factors are essential for epithelialization. This study examines the effect of extracts of different wound dressings on keratinocyte survival and proliferation. METHODS: Keratinocyte cultures were exposed for 40 hours to at least three extracts of each of the following wound dressings, which were tested in octuplicate: Acticoat, Aquacel-Ag, Aquacel, Algisite M, Avance, Comfeel Plus transparent, Contreet-H, Hydrasorb, and SeaSorb. Silicone extract provided the reference material. Controls were included of cells cultured in medium that had been incubated under conditions identical to those used with the extracts. Cell survival (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide reduction) and proliferation (5-bromo-2':-deoxyuridine incorporation) were measured. RESULTS: Extracts of silver-containing dressings (Acticoat, Aquacel-Ag, Contreet-H, and Avance) were most cytotoxic. Extracts of Hydrasorb were less cytotoxic but markedly affected keratinocyte proliferation and morphology. Extracts of alginate-containing dressings (Algisite M, SeaSorb, and Contreet-H) demonstrated high calcium concentrations, markedly reduced keratinocyte proliferation, and affected keratinocyte morphology. Extracts of Aquacel and Comfeel Plus transparent induced small but significant inhibition of keratinocyte proliferation. CONCLUSIONS: The principle of minimizing harm should be applied to the choice of wound dressing. Silver-based dressings are cytotoxic and should not be used in the absence of infection. Alginate dressings with high calcium content affect keratinocyte proliferation probably by triggering terminal differentiation of keratinocytes. Such dressings should be used with caution in cases in which keratinocyte proliferation is essential. All dressings should be tested in vitro before clinical application.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nanoparticle dermal absorption and toxicity: a review of the literature
Crosera, M., Bovenzi, M., Maina, G., Adami, G., Zanette, C., Florio, C., & Filon Larese, F. (2009) · International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health · doi:10.1007/s00420-009-0458-x · Cited by 297
Applications of mesenchymal stem cell-exosome components in wound infection healing: new insights
Fakouri, A., Razavi, Z.-S., Mohammed, A. T., Hussein, A. H. A., Afkhami, H., & Hooshiar, M. H. (2024) · Burns & Trauma · doi:10.1093/burnst/tkae021 · Cited by 69
Mohiti-Asli, M., Pourdeyhimi, B., & Loboa, E. G. (2014) · Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods · doi:10.1089/ten.tec.2013.0458 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Paddle-Ledinek, J. E., Nasa, Z., & Cleland, H. J.
- Venue
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- SUPPLEMENT
- Pages
- 110S-118S
- ISSN
- 0032-1052 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2003389996
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Different Wound Dressings on Cell Viability and Proliferation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.prs.0000225439.39352.ce
- The paper
- Paddle-Ledinek, J. E., Nasa, Z., & Cleland, H. J. (2006). Effect of Different Wound Dressings on Cell Viability and Proliferation. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000225439.39352.ce
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.