Cited by 75Nasal Surgery and Airway StudiesCleft Lip and Palate ResearchReconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques

Anterior Septal Reconstruction for Treatment of Severe Caudal Septal Deviation: Clinical Severity and Outcomes

Surowitz, Josh, Lee, Matthew K., Most, Sam P.·2015·Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery

Abstract

Objective: To report the long‐term efficacy of a modified extracorporeal septoplasty technique in the treatment of anterocaudal septal deviations. Study Design: Case series with chart review. Setting: Academic tertiary care medical center. Subjects and Methods: Data were obtained by a retrospective review of patients treated by a single surgeon (S.P.M.) from December 2010 to April 2014. A total of 77 patients (52 male, 25 female) met inclusion criteria. The Nasal Obstruction Septoplasty Effectiveness (NOSE) scale and a visual analog scale (VAS) were administered to all patients preoperatively and at each postoperative visit. Statistical analysis was performed using a matched‐pair t test comparing preoperative and postoperative NOSE and VAS scores. A recently described severity scale for nasal obstruction was applied to NOSE scores to demonstrate postoperative results. Results: Average follow‐up was 4.7 months. Average preoperative NOSE and VAS scores were 68.2 ± 17.4 and 7.2 ± 1.8, respectively, placing these patients in the “severe” symptoms classification. Average NOSE and VAS scores in the early postoperative period (1‐3 months after surgery) were 21.1 ± 19.8 (P <. 0001) and 2.1 ± 2.6 (P <. 0001), respectively. Average NOSE and VAS scores in the late postoperative period (>3 months after surgery) were 15.8 ± 19.0 (P <. 0001) and 1.4 ± 1.8 (P <. 0001), respectively. Both early and late postoperative NOSE scores represented “mild” symptomatology. Conclusions: Anterior septal reconstruction represents a powerful method for correction of nasal valve stenosis resulting from severe anterocaudal septal deviations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0194599815582176

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Anterior septal reconstruction is convenient for saving the nasal keystone region and provides a dorsal strut for a stable septal foundation.

    “The anterior septal reconstruction (ASR) is convenient for saving the valued nasal keystone region, the bone and cartilage junction of the upper and middle thirds of the nose, providing a dorsal strut for a stable septal foundation.13,14”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Surowitz, J., Lee, M. K., & Most, S. P.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Most, Sam P.
Venue
Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-04-16
Volume
153
Issue
1
Pages
27-33
ISSN
  • 0161-6439 (ISSN-L)
  • 0194-5998
  • 1097-6817
OpenAlex
W2087308622
Cited by
75
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
FWCI
7.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Otolaryngology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Cleft Lip and Palate Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
Keywords
caudal septal deviation, extracorporeal septoplasty, nasal obstruction, NOSE scale, long-term surgical outcomes
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nasal Septum, Retrospective Studies, Rhinoplasty, Ribs, Severity of Illness Index, Nasal Obstruction, Treatment Outcome, Nasal Cartilages, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review