Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 286

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Wound Therapy by Marrow Mesenchymal Cell Transplantation

Yoshikawa, Takafumi, Mitsuno, Hiroya, Nonaka, Iehisa, Sen, Yasunori, Kawanishi, Kouichi, Inada, Yuji, Takakura, Yoshinori, Okuchi, Kazuo, Nonomura, Akitaka·2008·Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Marrow mesenchymal cells are useful in regenerative medicine because they contain stem cells, but there have been few reports of clinical applications. The authors developed a new wound treatment technique by improving marrow mesenchymal cell culture methods and placing cultured cells in an artificial skin material. This new treatment was useful for tissue regeneration in 20 patients with skin wounds. METHODS: Marrow mesenchymal cells from a 46-year-old man were cultured and placed in artificial dermis made of collagen sponge. This composite graft was implanted subcutaneously into the back of a nude mouse and removed 10 days later; immunohistological analysis confirmed regeneration of subcutaneous tissue using human marrow mesenchymal cells. Next, in 20 patients (nine men and 11 women; average age, 64.8 years; range, 22 to 91 years) with intractable dermatopathies, 10 to 20 ml of bone marrow fluid was aspirated from the ilium and cultured in medium containing either fetal calf or autologous serum. The resulting cultured cells were placed in artificial dermis made of collagen sponge, and this composite graft was used to treat skin wounds. RESULTS: The wound mostly healed in 18 of the 20 patients; the remaining two patients died of causes unrelated to transplantation. In all patients, autologous marrow mesenchymal cell transplantation was shown to be therapeutically effective. CONCLUSIONS: In skin regeneration therapy using a marrow mesenchymal cell/artificial dermis composite graft, skin regeneration is possible with bone marrow aspiration, a minimally invasive procedure. Compared with existing skin grafting techniques, the present technique is practical and much less invasive.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.prs.0000299922.96006.24

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 286

Metadata

Authors
Yoshikawa, T., Mitsuno, H., Nonaka, I., Sen, Y., Kawanishi, K., Inada, Y., Takakura, Y., Okuchi, K., & Nonomura, A.
Venue
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Published
2008-03
Volume
121
Issue
3
Pages
860-877
ISSN
0032-1052 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2019548580
Cited by
286
References
0
FWCI
15.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wound Therapy by Marrow Mesenchymal Cell Transplantation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.prs.0000299922.96006.24
The paper
Yoshikawa, T., Mitsuno, H., Nonaka, I., Sen, Y., Kawanishi, K., Inada, Y., Takakura, Y., Okuchi, K., & Nonomura, A. (2008). Wound Therapy by Marrow Mesenchymal Cell Transplantation. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000299922.96006.24

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.