Cited by 299Pain Management and Placebo EffectPediatric Pain Management TechniquesPain Mechanisms and Treatments

Social Support and Experimental Pain

Brown, Jennifer L., Sheffield, David, Leary, Mark R., Robinson, Michael E.·2003·Psychosomatic Medicine

Abstract

Objective The purpose of this experimental study was to supplement and expand on clinical research demonstrating that the provision of social support is associated with lower levels of acute pain. Methods Undergraduates (52 men and 49 women) performed the cold pressor task either alone or accompanied by a friend or stranger who provided active support, passive support, or interaction. Pain perception was measured on a 10-point scale. Results Participants in the active support and passive support conditions reported less pain than participants in the alone and interaction conditions, regardless of whether they were paired with a friend or stranger. Conclusions These data suggest that the presence of an individual who provides passive or active support reduces experimental pain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.psy.0000030388.62434.46

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social support reduces pain intensity and unpleasantness and lessens threat during anticipation of pain.

    “Importantly, it is well established that social support has anti-nociceptive effects, evident in reduced pain intensity and unpleasantness ratings (Brown, Sheffield, Leary, & Robinson, 2003;Eisenberger et al., 2011;Master et al., 2009;Roberts, Klatzkin, & Mechlin, 2015;Younger, Aron, Parke, Chatterjee, & Mackey, 2010) and threat associated with pain anticipation (Coan, Schaefer, & Davidson, 2006).”

    From Oxytocin enhances the pain‐relieving effects of social support in romantic couples (2019) · cites this paper as Brown, Sheffield, Leary, & Robinson, 2003

  • Social interactions may reduce pain unpleasantness by decreasing the salience of noxious stimuli.

    “Accordingly, social interactions may serve as a calm model (Brown et al., 2003) and may reduce the unpleasantness of pain by diminishing the salience of noxious stimuli (Krahe, Springer, Weinman, & Fotopoulou, 2013).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, J. L., Sheffield, D., Leary, M. R., & Robinson, M. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida Health (US)
  • University of Staffordshire (GB)
Venue
Psychosomatic Medicine
Published
2003-03
Volume
65
Issue
2
Pages
276-283
ISSN
0033-3174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2028841195
Cited by
299
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 12
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychosomatic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01hl064580-04)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (1R01 HL 64580-01)
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (R01DE013208, 1R01 DE13208-01A2)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
social support, experimental pain, cold pressor task, active support, passive support, social interaction, pain coping
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Cold Temperature, Female, Humans, Male, Pain, Pain Measurement, Perception, Social Support, Friends

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review