Cited by 69Attachment and Relationship DynamicsPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and Placebo Effect

Attachment style moderates partner presence effects on pain: a laser-evoked potentials study

Open access
Krahé, Charlotte, Paloyelis, Yannis, Condon, Heather, Jenkinson, Paul M., Williams, Steven C. R., Fotopoulou, Aikaterini·2015·Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

Abstract

Social support is crucial for psychological and physical well-being. Yet, in experimental and clinical pain research, the presence of others has been found to both attenuate and intensify pain. To investigate the factors underlying these mixed effects, we administered noxious laser stimuli to 39 healthy women while their romantic partner was present or absent, and measured pain ratings and laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) to assess the effects of partner presence on subjective pain experience and underlying neural processes. Further, we examined whether individual differences in adult attachment style (AAS), alone or in interaction with the partner's level of attentional focus (manipulated to be either on or away from the participant) might modulate these effects. We found that the effects of partner presence vs absence on pain-related measures depended on AAS but not partner attentional focus. The higher participants' attachment avoidance, the higher pain ratings and N2 and P2 local peak amplitudes were in the presence compared with the absence of the romantic partner. As LEPs are thought to reflect activity relating to the salience of events, our data suggest that partner presence may influence the perceived salience of events threatening the body, particularly in individuals who tend to mistrust others.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/scan/nsu156

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krahé, C., Paloyelis, Y., Condon, H., Jenkinson, P. M., Williams, S. C. R., & Fotopoulou, A.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of Hertfordshire (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Krahé, Charlotte
Venue
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
Published
2015-01-01
Volume
10
Issue
8
Pages
1030-1037
ISSN
  • 1749-5016 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-5024
OpenAlex
W2144515269
Cited by
69
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2
FWCI
9.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Volkswagen Foundation (II/85 069)
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/K009400/1)
  • FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (313755)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
Keywords
adult attachment styles, partner presence, pain perception, social support, laser-evoked potentials, attachment avoidance, attentional focus, romantic partners, noxious stimulation
MeSH terms
Adult, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Individuality, Object Attachment, Pain, Pain Measurement, Social Support, Spouses, Trust, Young Adult, Laser-Evoked Potentials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review