Cited by 22Anesthesia and Pain ManagementPediatric Pain Management TechniquesPain Management and Placebo Effect

Text messaging reduces analgesic requirements during surgery

Guillory, Jamie E., Hancock, Jeffrey T., Woodruff, Christopher, Keilman, Jeffrey·2015·Pain Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine whether communicating via short message service text message during surgery procedures leads to decreased intake of fentanyl for patients receiving regional anesthesia below the waist compared with a distraction condition and no intervention. METHODS: Ninety-eight patients receiving regional anesthesia for minor surgeries were recruited from a hospital in Montreal, QC, between January and March 2012. Patients were randomly assigned to text message with a companion, text message with a stranger, play a distracting mobile phone game, or receive standard perioperative management. Participants who were asked to text message or play a game did so before receiving the anesthetic and continued until the end of the procedure. RESULTS: The odds of receiving supplemental analgesia during surgery for patients receiving standard perioperative management were 6.77 (P=0.009; N=13/25) times the odds for patients in the text a stranger condition (N=22/25 of patients), 4.39 times the odds for those in the text a companion condition (P=0.03; N=19/23), and 1.96 times the odds for those in the distraction condition (P=0.25; N=17/25). CONCLUSION: Text messaging during surgery provides analgesic-sparing benefits that surpass distraction techniques, suggesting that mobile phones provide new opportunities for social support to improve patient comfort and reduce analgesic requirements during minor surgeries and in other clinical settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/pme.12610

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guillory, J. E., Hancock, J. T., Woodruff, C., & Keilman, J.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
Guillory, Jamie E.
Venue
Pain Medicine
Published
2015-04
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
667-672
ISSN
  • 1526-2375 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-4637
OpenAlex
W2151771360
Cited by
22
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
Keywords
intraoperative analgesia, fentanyl requirement, regional anesthesia, distraction techniques, mobile games, social support, minor surgery, perioperative pain management
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Fentanyl, Humans, Male, Narcotics, Pain, Pain Management, Text Messaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review