Cited by 85Menstrual Health and DisordersChild Abuse and TraumaStress Responses and Cortisol

Biological correlates of abuse in women with premenstrual dysphoric disorder and healthy controls

Girdler, Susan S., Sherwood, Andrew, Hinderliter, Alan L., Leserman, Jane, Costello, Nancy L., Straneva, Patricia A., Pedersen, Cort A., Light, Kathleen C.·2003·Psychosomatic Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the biological correlates associated with histories of sexual or physical abuse in women meeting DSM criteria for premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) and in healthy, non-PMDD controls. METHODS: Twenty-eight women with prospectively confirmed PMDD were compared with 28 non-PMDD women for cardiovascular and neuroendocrine measures at rest and in response to mental stressors, and for beta-adrenergic receptor responsivity, during both the follicular and luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. Structured interview was used to assess psychiatric history and prior sexual and physical abuse experiences. All subjects were free of current psychiatric comorbidity and medication use. RESULTS: More PMDD women had prior sexual and physical abuse experiences than controls (20 vs. 10, respectively). Relative to nonabused PMDD women, PMDD women with prior abuse (sexual or physical) exhibited significantly lower resting norepinephrine (NE) levels and significantly greater beta1- and beta2-adrenoceptor responsivity and greater luteal phase NE reactivity to mental stress. For non-PMDD control women, abuse was associated with blunted cortisol, cardiac output, and heart rate reactivity to mental stress relative to nonabused controls. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this initial study suggest that a history of prior abuse is associated with alterations in physiological reactivity to subsequent mental stress in women, but that the biological correlates of abuse may be different for PMDD vs. non-PMDD women.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.psy.0000088593.38201.cd

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Girdler, S. S., Sherwood, A., Hinderliter, A. L., Leserman, J., Costello, N. L., Straneva, P. A., Pedersen, C. A., & Light, K. C.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
Psychosomatic Medicine
Published
2003-09
Volume
65
Issue
5
Pages
849-856
ISSN
0033-3174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2095116865
Cited by
85
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychosomatic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH051246, R01-MH51246)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR00046, M01RR000046)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
premenstrual dysphoric disorder, child sexual abuse, physical abuse, norepinephrine, cortisol, heart rate reactivity, cardiac output, menstrual cycle, luteal phase, women
MeSH terms
Adult, Cardiography, Impedance, Child, Child Abuse, Child Abuse, Sexual, Female, Follicular Phase, Hemodynamics, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Interview, Psychological, Luteal Phase, Norepinephrine, Premenstrual Syndrome, Prospective Studies, Receptors, Adrenergic, beta, Sex Offenses, Stress, Psychological, Violence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review