Cited by 192Neurological disorders and treatmentsAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders

Neurostimulation System Used for Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS): MR Safety Issues and Implications of Failing to Follow Safety Recommendations

Rezai, Ali R., Phillips, Michael, Baker, Kenneth B., Sharan, Ashwini D., Nyenhuis, John, Tkach, Jean, Henderson, Jaimie, Shellock, Frank G.·2004·Investigative Radiology

Abstract

The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with neurostimulation systems used for deep brain stimulation requires the utmost care, and no individual should undergo an MR examination in the absence of empirical evidence that the procedure can be performed safely. The risks of performing MRI in patients with neurostimulators include those associated with heating, magnetic field interactions, induced currents, and the functional disruption of these devices. The exact safety recommendations for the particular neurostimulation system with regard to the pulse generator, leads, electrodes, operational conditions for the device, the positioning of these components, and the MR system conditions must be carefully followed for MRI. As highlighted by 2 recent accidents, the failure to strictly follow safety recommendations (eg, use a 1.5-T MR system with a send/receive head radiofrequency coil only; limit the specific absorption rate to 0.4 W/kg; etc.) may result in serious, temporary, or permanent injury to the patient including the possibility of transient dystonia, paralysis, coma, or even death.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.rli.0000124940.02340.ab

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rezai, A. R., Phillips, M., Baker, K. B., Sharan, A. D., Nyenhuis, J., Tkach, J., Henderson, J., & Shellock, F. G.
Affiliations
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • Thomas Jefferson University (US)
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
  • Rezai, Ali R.
  • Phillips, Michael
  • Baker, Kenneth B.
  • Tkach, Jean
  • Henderson, Jaimie
Venue
Investigative Radiology
Published
2004-05
Volume
39
Issue
5
Pages
300-303
ISSN
0020-9996 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2063641219
Cited by
192
References
13
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 9
FWCI
9.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Investigative Radiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ns044575-03)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS44575-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Keywords
deep brain stimulation, MRI safety, implanted pulse generator, MRI-induced heating, magnetic field interaction, induced current, equipment failure, specific absorption rate, radiofrequency coils, dystonia, patient harm
MeSH terms
Brain Diseases, Electric Conductivity, Electrodes, Implanted, Electromagnetic Fields, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Equipment Safety, Hot Temperature, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Wounds and Injuries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review