The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Evidence-Based Virtual Reality Training Program for Novice Laparoscopic Surgeons
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop an evidence-based virtual reality laparoscopic training curriculum for novice laparoscopic surgeons to achieve a proficient level of skill prior to participating in live cases. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Technical skills for laparoscopic surgery must be acquired within a competency-based curriculum that begins in the surgical skills laboratory. Implementation of this program necessitates the definition of the validity, learning curves and proficiency criteria on the training tool. METHODS: The study recruited 40 surgeons, classified into experienced (performed >100 laparoscopic cholecystectomies) or novice groups (<10 laparoscopic cholecystectomies). Ten novices and 10 experienced surgeons were tested on basic tasks, and 11 novices and 9 experienced surgeons on a procedural module for dissection of Calot triangle. Performance of the 2 groups was assessed using time, error, and economy of movement parameters. RESULTS: All basic tasks demonstrated construct validity (Mann-Whitney U test, P < 0.05), and learning curves for novices plateaued at a median of 7 repetitions (Friedman's test, P < 0.05). Expert surgeons demonstrated a learning rate at a median of 2 repetitions (P < 0.05). Performance on the dissection module demonstrated significant differences between experts and novices (P < 0.002); learning curves for novice subjects plateaued at the fourth repetition (P < 0.05). Expert benchmark criteria were defined for validated parameters on each task. CONCLUSION: A competency-based training curriculum for novice laparoscopic surgeons has been defined. This can serve to ensure that junior trainees have acquired prerequisite levels of skill prior to entering the operating room, and put them directly into practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Seymour, N. E., Gallagher, A. G., Roman, S. A., O’Brien, M. K., Bansal, V. K., Andersen, D. K., & Satava, R. M. (2002) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-200210000-00008 · Cited by 2,853
Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training
Grantcharov, T. P., Kristiansen, V. B., Bendix, J., Bardram, L., Rosenberg, J., & Funch-Jensen, P. (2004) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.4407 · Cited by 1,234
Self-citationThe financial impact of teaching surgical residents in the operating room
Bridges, M., & Diamond, D. L. (1999) · The American Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00289-x · Cited by 798
Laparoscopic skills training and assessment
Aggarwal, R., Moorthy, K., & Darzi, A. (2004) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.4816 · Cited by 475
Self-citationThe learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Club, T. S. S., Moore, M. J., & Bennett, C. L. (1995) · The American Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0002-9610(99)80252-9 · Cited by 474
Skill Acquisition and Assessment for Laparoscopic Surgery
Rosser, J. C. (1997) · Archives of Surgery · doi:10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430260098021 · Cited by 389
What do master surgeons think of surgical competence and revalidation?
Cuschieri, A., Francis, N. K., Crosby, J., et al. (2001) · The American Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0002-9610(01)00667-5 · Cited by 184
Practice distribution in procedural skills training: A randomized controlled trial
Mackay, S., Morgan, P., Datta, V., Chang, A., & Darzi, A. (2002) · Surgical Endoscopy · doi:10.1007/s00464-001-9132-4 · Cited by 171
Self-citationThe role of simulation in surgical training.
Torkington, J., Smith, S. G., Rees, B. I., & Darzi, A. W. (2000) · PubMed Central · Cited by 168
Self-citationSurgical Simulation and Virtual Reality: The Coming Revolution
Krummel, T. M. (1998) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-199811000-00002 · Cited by 159
Cited by
Virtual reality training for surgical trainees in laparoscopic surgery
Nagendran, M., Gurusamy, K. S., Aggarwal, R., Loizidou, M., & Davidson, B. R. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006575.pub3 · Cited by 593
Self-citationMental Practice: Effective Stress Management Training for Novice Surgeons
Arora, S., Aggarwal, R., Moran, A., Sirimanna, P., Crochet, P., Darzi, A., Kneebone, R., & Sevdalis, N. (2011) · Journal of the American College of Surgeons · doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.09.025 · Cited by 140
Self-citationWeb-based simulation in psychiatry residency training: a pilot study
Gorrindo, T., Baer, L., Sanders, K. M., Birnbaum, R. J., Fromson, J. A., Sutton-Skinner, K. M., Romeo, S. A., & Beresin, E. V. (2011) · Academic Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ap.35.4.232 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Aggarwal, R., Grantcharov, T. P., Eriksen, J. R., Blirup, D., Kristiansen, V. B., Funch-Jensen, P., & Darzi, A.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2006-08
- Volume
- 244
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 310-314
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2094891574
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 20.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Evidence-Based Virtual Reality Training Program for Novice Laparoscopic Surgeons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.sla.0000218094.92650.44
- The paper
- Aggarwal, R., Grantcharov, T. P., Eriksen, J. R., Blirup, D., Kristiansen, V. B., Funch-Jensen, P., & Darzi, A. (2006). An Evidence-Based Virtual Reality Training Program for Novice Laparoscopic Surgeons. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000218094.92650.44
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.