Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 339

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An Evidence-Based Virtual Reality Training Program for Novice Laparoscopic Surgeons

Open access
Aggarwal, Rajesh, Grantcharov, Teodor P., Eriksen, Jens R., Blirup, Dorthe, Kristiansen, Viggo B., Funch-Jensen, Peter, Darzi, Ara·2006·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop an evidence-based virtual reality laparoscopic training curriculum for novice laparoscopic surgeons to achieve a proficient level of skill prior to participating in live cases. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Technical skills for laparoscopic surgery must be acquired within a competency-based curriculum that begins in the surgical skills laboratory. Implementation of this program necessitates the definition of the validity, learning curves and proficiency criteria on the training tool. METHODS: The study recruited 40 surgeons, classified into experienced (performed >100 laparoscopic cholecystectomies) or novice groups (<10 laparoscopic cholecystectomies). Ten novices and 10 experienced surgeons were tested on basic tasks, and 11 novices and 9 experienced surgeons on a procedural module for dissection of Calot triangle. Performance of the 2 groups was assessed using time, error, and economy of movement parameters. RESULTS: All basic tasks demonstrated construct validity (Mann-Whitney U test, P < 0.05), and learning curves for novices plateaued at a median of 7 repetitions (Friedman's test, P < 0.05). Expert surgeons demonstrated a learning rate at a median of 2 repetitions (P < 0.05). Performance on the dissection module demonstrated significant differences between experts and novices (P < 0.002); learning curves for novice subjects plateaued at the fourth repetition (P < 0.05). Expert benchmark criteria were defined for validated parameters on each task. CONCLUSION: A competency-based training curriculum for novice laparoscopic surgeons has been defined. This can serve to ensure that junior trainees have acquired prerequisite levels of skill prior to entering the operating room, and put them directly into practice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.sla.0000218094.92650.44

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Cited by

See all 339

Metadata

Authors
Aggarwal, R., Grantcharov, T. P., Eriksen, J. R., Blirup, D., Kristiansen, V. B., Funch-Jensen, P., & Darzi, A.
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2006-08
Volume
244
Issue
2
Pages
310-314
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2094891574
Cited by
339
References
11
FWCI
20.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Evidence-Based Virtual Reality Training Program for Novice Laparoscopic Surgeons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.sla.0000218094.92650.44
The paper
Aggarwal, R., Grantcharov, T. P., Eriksen, J. R., Blirup, D., Kristiansen, V. B., Funch-Jensen, P., & Darzi, A. (2006). An Evidence-Based Virtual Reality Training Program for Novice Laparoscopic Surgeons. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000218094.92650.44

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.