Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 281

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Steatosis as a Risk Factor in Liver Surgery

Open access
Vetel??inen, Reeta, van Vliet, Arl??ne, Gouma, Dirk J., van Gulik, Thomas M.·2007·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

In Brief Objective: To review present knowledge of the influence of hepatic steatosis in liver surgery as derived from experimental and clinical studies. Summary Background Data: Hepatic steatosis is the most common chronic liver disease in the Western world, and it is associated with obesity, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome. Fatty accumulation affects hepatocyte homeostasis and potentially impairs recovery of steatotic livers after resection. This is reflected clinically in increased mortality and morbidity after liver resection in patients with any grade of steatosis. Because of the epidemic increase of obesity, hepatic steatosis will play an even more significant role in liver surgery. Methods: A literature review was performed using MEDLINE and key words related to experimental and clinical studies concerning steatosis. Results: Experimental studies show the increased vulnerability of steatotic livers to various insults, attributed to underlying metabolic and pathologic derangements induced by fatty accumulation. In clinical studies, the severity of steatosis has an important impact on patient outcome and mortality. Even the mildest form of steatosis increases the risk of postoperative complications. Conclusions: Hepatic steatosis is a major factor determining patient outcome after surgery. Further research is needed to clarify the clinical relevance of all forms and severity grades of steatosis for patient outcome. Standardized grading and diagnostic methods need to be used in future clinical trials to be able to compare outcomes of different studies. Hepatic steatosis significantly affects postoperative patient outcome after liver surgery. The increased susceptibility to injury of steatotic livers is attributed to underlying metabolic and pathologic derangements. This review addresses the morphology and mechanisms involved in damage occurring in steatotic livers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.sla.0000225113.88433.cf

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

See all 281

Metadata

Authors
Vetel??inen, R., van Vliet, A., Gouma, D. J., & van Gulik, T. M.
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2007-01
Volume
245
Issue
1
Pages
20-30
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1996775250
Cited by
281
References
10
FWCI
7.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Steatosis as a Risk Factor in Liver Surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.sla.0000225113.88433.cf
The paper
Vetel??inen, R., van Vliet, A., Gouma, D. J., & van Gulik, T. M. (2007). Steatosis as a Risk Factor in Liver Surgery. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000225113.88433.cf

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.