Cited by 631Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesObesity, Physical Activity, DietBariatric Surgery and Outcomes

Obesity in general elective surgery

Dindo, Daniel, Muller, Markus K, Weber, Markus, Clavien, Pierre-Alain·2003·The Lancet

Abstract

Background Obese patients are generally believed to be at a higher risk for surgery than those who are not obese, although convincing data are lacking.Methods We prospectively investigated a cohort of 6336 patients undergoing general elective surgery at our institution to assess whether obesity affects the outcome of surgery. Exclusion criteria were emergency, vascular, thoracic, and bariatric operations; transplantation procedures; patients under immunosuppression; and operations done under local anaesthesia. Postoperative morbidity was analysed for non-obese and obese patients (body-mass index <30 kg/m(2) vs >or=30 kg/m(2)). Obesity was further stratified into mild obesity (30.0-34.9 kg/m(2)) and severe obesity (>or=35 kg/m(2)). Risk factors were analysed with univariate and multivariate models.Findings The cohort consisted of 6336 patients, of whom 808 (13%) were obese, 569 (9%) were mildly obese, and 239 (4%) had severe obesity. The morbidity rates in patients who were obese compared with those who were not were much the same (122 [15.1%] of 808 vs 901 [16.3%] of 5528; p=0.26), with the exception of an increased incidence of wound infections after open surgery in patients who were obese (17 [4%] of 431 vs 92 [3%] of 3555, p=0.03). Incidence of complications did not differ between patients who were mildly obese (91 [16.0%] of 569), severely obese (36 [15.1%] of 239), and non-obese (901 [16.3%] of 5528; p=0.19). In multivariate regression analyses, obesity was not a risk factor for development of postoperative complications. Of note, the additional medical resource use as estimated by a new classification of complications showed no differences between patients who were and were not obese.Interpretation Obesity alone is not a risk factor for postoperative complications. The regressive attitude towards general surgery in obese patients is no longer justified.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13640-9

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dindo, D., Muller, M. K., Weber, M., & Clavien, P.-A.
Affiliations
University Hospital Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Clavien, Pierre-Alain
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-06
Volume
361
Issue
9374
Pages
2032-2035
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2135384303
Cited by
630
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 39
FWCI
12.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Universität Zürich
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Keywords
obesity, postoperative complications, postoperative morbidity, body mass index, wound infection, surgical risk factors, medical resource use, morbid obesity
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Female, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Postoperative Complications, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Surgical Wound Infection, Elective Surgical Procedures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review