Cited by 37Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Evaluation of Selection Bias in an Incident-Based Dementia Autopsy Case Series

Open access
Tsuang, Debby, Simpson, Kate L, Li, Gail, Barnhart, Ross L, Edland, Steven D, Bowen, James, McCormick, Wayne, Teri, Linda +4 more·2005·Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders

Abstract

Neuropathological (np) relative frequency estimates of dementia may be biased if the autopsied subjects are not representative of all dementia subjects within a target population. We identified characteristics that differed between autopsied and non-autopsied subjects from an incident-based dementia case series and compared autopsy-based estimates of the relative frequency of np diagnoses before and after adjusting for potential selection bias. Clinically demented subjects who were autopsied (n = 206), had died but were not autopsied (n = 271), were still alive (n = 71), or had dropped out of the study (n = 82) were included. Compared with non-autopsied subjects, autopsied subjects were more likely to be Caucasian, educated beyond high school, and married. They also tended to have a lower baseline Mini-Mental State Examination score and were more likely to have a clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer disease (AD) than non-autopsied subjects. Neuropathological AD with Lewy bodies (LB) had the largest crude relative frequency estimate at 38% of the autopsy sample, followed by 25% for AD with vascular lesions, 13% for pure AD, 13% for LB (with or without vascular lesions), and 8% for pure vascular pathologies. Adjustment for potential sources of selection bias had little effect on relative frequency estimates, suggesting that np diagnoses in the autopsied subjects provide reasonable dementia relative frequency estimates among all clinically demented cases in this series.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.wad.0000165507.67993.47

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One study has reported no evident selection bias between autopsied and non-autopsied subjects among an incident community-diagnosed dementia series, suggesting that dementia case composition may not be substantially different in different settings.

    “However, one study has reported no evident selection bias between autopsied and non-autopsied subjects among an incident community-diagnosed dementia series, suggesting that dementia case composition may not be substantially different in different settings (48).”

    From Accuracy of the Clinical Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease at National Institute on Aging Alzheimer Disease Centers, 2005–2010 (2012) · cites this paper as [48]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Sample selection in incident-based dementia autopsy series has an effect (a caveat).

    “A specific caveat in this respect is the effect of sample selection in incident-bases dementia autopsy series [164].”
  • Community samples tend to show greater degrees of cerebrovascular pathology compared to hospital-based samples.

    “Community samples tend to show greater degrees of cerebrovascular pathology as compared to hospital based samples; and the prevalence of mixed AD/CVD was higher in the community-based RUSH Memory and Aging Project (44%) than in the RUSH Religious Order Study (28%).”
  • The prevalence of mixed AD/CVD was higher in the community-based RUSH Memory and Aging Project (44%) than in the RUSH Religious Order Study (28%).

    “Community samples tend to show greater degrees of cerebrovascular pathology as compared to hospital based samples; and the prevalence of mixed AD/CVD was higher in the community-based RUSH Memory and Aging Project (44%) than in the RUSH Religious Order Study (28%).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tsuang, D., Simpson, K. L., Li, G., Barnhart, R. L., Edland, S. D., Bowen, J., McCormick, W., Teri, L., Nochlin, D., Larson, E. B., Thompson, M. L., & Leverenz, J. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Centers (US)
Corresponding author
  • Tsuang, Debby
  • Simpson, Kate L
  • Li, Gail
  • Teri, Linda
  • Leverenz, James B
Venue
Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders
Published
2005-04
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
67-73
ISSN
0893-0341 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2063879864
Cited by
37
References
20
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (AG 05136, U01AG006781, AG-06781, P50AG005136)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS048595, R01 NS48595)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
selection bias, dementia, neuropathological diagnosis, autopsy, Alzheimer's disease, Lewy bodies, vascular dementia, sample representativeness
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analysis of Variance, Autopsy, Dementia, Female, Humans, Male, Registries, Selection Bias, Incidence, Chi-Square Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review