Cited by 69Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Impact of Sample Selection on APOE ∈4 Allele Frequency: A Comparison of Two Alzheimer's Disease Samples

Tsuang, Debby, Kukull, Walter, Sheppard, Lianne, Barnhart, Ross L., Peskind, Elaine, Edland, Steve D., Schellenberg, Gerard, Raskind, Murray +1 more·1996·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

Objective In a highly selected sample of unrelated Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients, we found that the APOE epsilon 4 allele frequency was higher than previously reported. Differing selection and ascertainment criteria may lead to these differences. To address this possibility, we compared the epsilon 4 allele frequency in two samples of AD patients selected from the same geographical area. Setting and participants Cases (n = 55) and controls (n = 99) from a research clinic-based sample were compared with subjects (n = 537) from a community-based AD patient sample. The samples consisted of unrelated cases who met NINCDS/ADRDA criteria for probable AD. Design and measurements Clinical characteristics and APOE genotype data were obtained from AD cases and controls from both samples. Results Frequency of APOE epsilon 4 allele in the research cases compared with the community cases (0.45 vs 0.36) was nearly significant. We compared demographic and clinical characteristics that might account for this difference and found that the research cases were younger, had an earlier age of onset, and had more advanced disease than the community cases. After onset age was controlled, there was no overall difference between epsilon 4 allele frequency of the two samples. Conclusions We found that the epsilon 4 allele frequency tended to be higher in the research AD sample compared the community-based sample. The two samples differed in several demographic and clinical characteristics. We conc…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb01836.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tsuang, D., Kukull, W., Sheppard, L., Barnhart, R. L., Peskind, E., Edland, S. D., Schellenberg, G., Raskind, M., & Larson, E. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
Corresponding author
Tsuang, Debby
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-06
Volume
44
Issue
6
Pages
704-707
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W2074222908
Cited by
69
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • University of Washington
  • National Institute on Aging (P50 AG05136, U01-AG-06781, U01AG006781, R01AG07584, R01AG007584, P50AG005136)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
APOE ε4, allele frequency, Alzheimer's disease, sample selection bias, age of onset, disease severity, genetic association studies, NINCDS-ADRDA criteria
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Apolipoproteins E, Female, Gene Frequency, Genotype, Humans, Male, Washington, Selection Bias, Logistic Models, Case-Control Studies, Age of Onset, Apolipoprotein E4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review