CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 296Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchTrauma and Emergency Care Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Energy Dysfunction as a Predictor of Outcome after Moderate or Severe Head Injury: Indices of Oxygen, Glucose, and Lactate Metabolism

Glenn, Thomas C, Kelly, Daniel F, Boscardin, W John, McArthur, David L, Vespa, Paul, Oertel, Matthias, Hovda, David A, Bergsneider, Marvin, Hillered, Lars, Martin, Neil A·2003·Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
DOI 10.1097/01.wcb.0000089833.23606.7f
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study was to determine if the relationship between abnormalities in glucose, lactate, and oxygen metabolism were predictive of neurologic outcome after moderate or severe head injury, relative to other known prognostic factors. Serial assessments of the cerebral metabolic rates for glucose, lactate, and oxygen were performed using a modified Kety-Schmidt method. In total, 31 normal control subjects were studied once, and 49 TBI patients (mean age 36+/-16 years, median GCS 7) were studied five times median per patient from postinjury days 0 to 9. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Univariate analysis showed that the 6-month postinjury Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) was most strongly associated with the mean cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO2) (P = 0.0001), mean arterial lactate level (P = 0.0001), mean arterial glucose (P = 0.0008), mean cerebral blood flow (CBF), (P = 0.002), postresuscitation GCS (P = 0.003), and pupillary status (P = 0.004). Brain lactate uptake was observed in 44% of all metabolic studies, and 76% of patients had at least one episode of brain lactate uptake. By dichotomized GOS, patients achieving a favorable outcome (GOS 4-5) were distinguished from those with an unfavorable outcome (GOS1-3) by having a higher CMRO2 (P = 0.003), a higher rate of abnormal brain lactate uptake relative to arterial lactate levels (P = 0.04), and lesser degrees of blood-brain barrier damage based on CT findings (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: During the first 6 days after moderate or severe TBI, CMRO2 and arterial lactate levels are the strongest predictors of neurologic outcome. However, the frequent occurrence of abnormal brain lactate uptake despite only moderate elevations in arterial lactate levels in the favorable outcome patients suggests the brain's ability to use lactate as a fuel may be another key outcome predictor. Future studies are needed to determine to what degree nonglycolytic energy production from alternative fuels such as lactate occurs after TBI and whether alternative fuel administration is a viable therapy for TBI patients.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.wcb.0000089833.23606.7f

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 80 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Alessandri B, 1999, Acta Neurochir Suppl, 75, 25
  2. Amaral JF, 1986, Surgery, 100, 252
  3. Beaumont A, 2002, Acta Neurochir Suppl, 81, 217
  4. Chieregato A, 2002, Acta Neurochir, 81, 289
  5. Hovda DA, 1996, Neurotrama, 1459
  6. Obrist WD, 1996, Neurotrauma, 471
  7. Obrist WD, 1993, J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 13, S571
  8. Reinert M, 2000, Acta Neurochir, 76, 439
  9. Simonsen L, 1994, Am J Physiol, 266, E357
  10. Yamaki T, 1996, J Nucl Med, 37, 1166

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Glenn, T. C., Kelly, D. F., Boscardin, W. J., McArthur, D. L., Vespa, P., Oertel, M., Hovda, D. A., Bergsneider, M., Hillered, L., & Martin, N. A.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Uppsala University Hospital (SE)
Corresponding author
Kelly, Daniel F
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2003-10
Volume
23
Issue
10
Pages
1239-1250
ISSN
  • 0271-678X (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-7016
DOI
10.1097/01.wcb.0000089833.23606.7f
OpenAlex
W2028546276
Cited by
296
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 13
FWCI
5.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P50NS030308, NS 30308)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
Keywords
traumatic brain injury, brain energy metabolism, cerebral oxygen consumption, arterial lactate, brain glucose metabolism, prognostic factors, neurological outcome, Glasgow Outcome Scale, Kety-Schmidt method, cerebral blood flow, blood-brain barrier disruption, cerebral hypoxia
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Brain Injuries, Hypoxia, Brain, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Energy Metabolism, Female, Glucose, Glycolysis, Humans, Hypotension, Intracranial Pressure, Male, Middle Aged, Oxidative Phosphorylation, Oxygen, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Pupil Disorders, Cohort Studies, Glasgow Coma Scale, Multivariate Analysis, Lactic Acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review