Cited by 60Innovations in Medical EducationEmpathy and Medical EducationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Technology Can Augment, but Not Replace, Critical Human Skills Needed for Patient Care

Alrassi, James, Katsufrakis, Peter J., Chandran, Latha·2021·Academic Medicine

Abstract

The practice of medicine is changing rapidly as a consequence of electronic health record adoption, new technologies for patient care, disruptive innovations that breakdown professional hierarchies, and evolving societal norms. Collectively, these have resulted in the modification of the physician’s role as the gatekeeper for health care, increased shift-based care, and amplified interprofessional team-based care. Technological innovations present opportunities as well as challenges. Artificial intelligence, which has great potential, has already transformed some tasks, particularly those involving image interpretation. Ubiquitous access to information via the Internet by physicians and patients alike presents benefits as well as drawbacks: patients and providers have ready access to virtually all of human knowledge, but some websites are contaminated with misinformation and many people have difficulty differentiating between solid, evidence-based data and untruths. The role of the future physician will shift as complexity in health care increases and as artificial intelligence and other technologies advance. These technological advances demand new skills of physicians; memory and knowledge accumulation will diminish in importance while information management skills will become more important. In parallel, medical educators must enhance their teaching and assessment of critical human skills (e.g., clear communication, empathy) in the delivery of patient care. The authors emphasize the enduring role of critical human skills in safe and effective patient care even as medical practice is increasingly guided by artificial intelligence and related technology, and they suggest new and longitudinal ways of assessing essential noncognitive skills to meet the demands of the future. The authors envision practical and achievable benefits accruing to patients and providers if practitioners leverage technological advancements to facilitate the development of their critical human skills.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/acm.0000000000003733

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alrassi, J., Katsufrakis, P. J., & Chandran, L.
Affiliations
  • SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University (US)
  • National Board of Medical Examiners (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
Corresponding author
Chandran, Latha
Venue
Academic Medicine
Published
2020-12-29
Volume
96
Issue
1
Pages
37-43
ISSN
1040-2446 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3084074804
Cited by
60
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5
FWCI
3.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Academic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
non-cognitive skills, artificial intelligence in healthcare, physician role, electronic health records, interprofessional team care, medical education, empathy, communication skills, health misinformation, physician-patient communication
MeSH terms
Adult, Artificial Intelligence, Clinical Competence, Empathy, Female, Patient Care, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Physician's Role, Physicians, Therapy, Computer-Assisted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review