Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 35

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Consensus-Driven Priorities for Firearm Injury Education Among Medical Professionals

Hoops, Katherine, Fahimi, Jahan, Khoeur, Lina, Studenmund, Christine, Barber, Catherine, Barnhorst, Amy, Betz, Marian E., Crifasi, Cassandra K., Davis, John A., Dewispelaere, William, Fisher, Lynn, Howard, Patricia K., Ketterer, Andrew, Marcolini, Evie, Nestadt, Paul S., Rozel, John, Simonetti, Joseph A., Spitzer, Sarabeth, Victoroff, Michael, Williams, Brian H., Howley, Lisa, Ranney, Megan L.·2022·Academic Medicine
DOI 10.1097/acm.0000000000004226
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Purpose: Firearm injury is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. However, many medical professionals currently receive minimal or no education on firearm injury or its prevention. The authors sought to convene a diverse group of national experts in firearm injury epidemiology, injury prevention, and medical education to develop consensus on priorities to inform the creation of learning objectives and curricula for firearm injury education for medical professionals. Method: In 2019, the authors convened an advisory group that was geographically, demographically, and professionally diverse, composed of 33 clinicians, researchers, and educators from across the United States. They used the nominal group technique to achieve consensus on priorities for health professions education on firearm injury. The process involved an initial idea-generating phase, followed by a round-robin sharing of ideas and further idea generation, facilitated discussion and clarification, and the ranking of ideas to generate a prioritized list. Results: This report provides the first national consensus guidelines on firearm injury education for medical professionals. These priorities include a set of crosscutting, basic, and advanced learning objectives applicable to all contexts of firearm injury and all medical disciplines, specialties, and levels of training. They focus on 7 contextual categories that had previously been identified in the literature: 1 category of general priorities applicable to all contexts and 6 categories of specific contexts, including intimate partner violence, mass violence, officer-involved shootings, peer (nonpartner) violence, suicide, and unintentional injury. Conclusions: Robust, data- and consensus-driven priorities for health professions education on firearm injury create a pathway to clinician competence and self-efficacy. With an improved foundation for curriculum development and educational program-building, clinicians will be better informed to engage in a host of firearm injury prevention initiatives both at the bedside and in their communities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/acm.0000000000004226

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

1 more claim about this paper

Create a free account to see every claim other papers make about this one.

See all claims — free account

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 66

  1. Spitzer, 2017, Costs and financial burden of initial hospitalizations for firearm injuries in the United States, 2006-2014., Am J Public Health, 107, 770, 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303684 · DOI
  2. Spitzer, 2019, Readmission risk and costs of firearm injuries in the United States, 2010-2015., PLoS One, 14, e0209896, 10.1371/journal.pone.0209896 · DOI
  3. Centor, 2019, Annals on call—Firearm violence: A call to action., Ann Intern Med, 171, OC1
  4. Pallin, 2019, Preventing firearm-related death and injury., Ann Intern Med, 170, ITC81, 10.7326/AITC201906040 · DOI
  5. Roszko, 2016, Clinician attitudes, screening practices, and interventions to reduce firearm-related injury., Epidemiol Rev, 38, 87, 10.1093/epirev/mxv005 · DOI
  6. Grossman, 2000, Firearm safety counseling in primary care pediatrics: A randomized, controlled trial., Pediatrics, 106, 22, 10.1542/peds.106.1.22 · DOI
  7. Barkin, 2008, Is office-based counseling about media use, timeouts, and firearm storage effective? Results from a cluster-randomized, controlled trial., Pediatrics, 122, e15, 10.1542/peds.2007-2611 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Brent, 2000, Compliance with recommendations to remove firearms in families participating in a clinical trial for adolescent depression., J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 39, 1220, 10.1097/00004583-200010000-00007 · DOI
  9. Miller, 2020, Changes in firearm and medication storage practices in homes of youths at risk for suicide: Results of the SAFETY Study, a clustered, emergency department-based, multisite, stepped-wedge trial., Ann Emerg Med, 76, 194, 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.02.007 · DOI
  10. Hoops, 2019, Pediatric resident firearm-related anticipatory guidance: Why are we still not talking about guns?, Prev Med, 124, 29, 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.04.020 · DOI
  11. Price, 2013, Perceived roles of emergency department physicians regarding anticipatory guidance on firearm safety., J Emerg Med, 44, 1007, 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.11.010 · DOI
  12. Ketterer, 2020, Emergency providers’ familiarity with firearms: A national survey., Acad Emerg Med, 27, 185, 10.1111/acem.13849 · DOI
  13. Butkus, 2014, Internists’ attitudes toward prevention of firearm injury., Ann Intern Med, 160, 821, 10.7326/M13-1960 · DOI
  14. Walters, 2012, Feasibility and acceptability of interventions to delay gun access in VA mental health settings., Gen Hosp Psychiatry, 34, 692, 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2012.07.012 · DOI
  15. Betz, 2015, Physician counseling on firearm safety: A new kind of cultural competence., JAMA, 314, 449, 10.1001/jama.2015.7055 · DOI
  16. Crifasi, 2018, Storage practices of US gun owners in 2016., Am J Public Health, 108, 532, 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304262 · DOI
  17. Knoepke, 2017, Loaded questions: Internet commenters’ opinions on physician-patient firearm safety conversations., West J Emerg Med, 18, 903, 10.5811/westjem.2017.6.34849 · DOI
  18. Bulger, 2019, Proceedings from the Medical Summit on Firearm Injury Prevention: A public health approach to reduce death and disability in the US., J Am Coll Surg, 229, 415, 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.05.018 · DOI
  19. Damari, 2018, Continuing medical education and firearm violence counseling., AMA J Ethics, 20, 56, 10.1001/journalofethics.2018.20.1.stas1-1801 · DOI
  20. Puttagunta, 2016, What is taught on firearm safety in undergraduate, graduate, and continuing medical education? A review of educational programs., Acad Psychiatry, 40, 821, 10.1007/s40596-016-0490-6 · DOI
  21. Yanes, 2017, Gun violence and firearm safety in medical school curricula: Missed opportunities to improve patient health., JAMA Intern Med, 177, 11, 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.6734 · DOI
  22. Blood, 2020, Curriculum changes and trends 2010-2020: A focused national review using the AAMC Curriculum Inventory and the LCME Annual Medical School Questionnaire Part II., Acad Med, 95, S5, 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003484 · DOI
  23. Zevin, 2012, A consensus-based framework for design, validation, and implementation of simulation-based training curricula in surgery., J Am Coll Surg, 215, 580, 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.05.035 · DOI
  24. Valerio, 2016, Comparing two sampling methods to engage hard-to-reach communities in research priority setting., BMC Med Res Methodol, 16, 146, 10.1186/s12874-016-0242-z · DOI · Paper page
  25. Humphrey-Murto, 2017, The use of the Delphi and other consensus group methods in medical education research: A review., Acad Med, 92, 1491, 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001812 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Humphrey-Murto, 2017, Using consensus group methods such as Delphi and Nominal Group in medical education research., Med Teach, 39, 14, 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1245856 · DOI
  27. Kiley, 2009, Threshold concepts in research education and evidence of threshold crossing., Higher Educ Res Dev, 28, 431, 10.1080/07294360903067930 · DOI
  28. Cunningham, 2019, Prevention of firearm injuries among children and adolescents: Consensus-driven research agenda from the Firearm Safety Among Children and Teens (FACTS) Consortium., JAMA Pediatr, 173, 780, 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.1494 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Ranney, 2017, A consensus-driven agenda for emergency medicine firearm injury prevention research., Ann Emerg Med, 69, 227, 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.08.454 · DOI
  30. Zeoli, 2016, Risks and targeted interventions: Firearms in intimate partner violence., Epidemiol Rev, 38, 125
  31. Choo, 2014, The intersecting roles of violence, gender, and substance use in the emergency department: A research agenda., Acad Emerg Med, 21, 1447, 10.1111/acem.12525 · DOI
  32. Adhia, 2019, The role of intimate partner violence in homicides of children aged 2-14 years., Am J Prev Med, 56, 38, 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.08.028 · DOI
  33. Barber, 2008, Suicides and suicide attempts following homicide: Victim–suspect relationship, weapon type, and presence of antidepressants., Homicide Stud, 12, 285, 10.1177/1088767908319597 · DOI
  34. Kropp, 2008, Intimate partner violence risk assessment and management., Violence Vict, 23, 202, 10.1891/0886-6708.23.2.202 · DOI
  35. Alvarez, 2017, Provider screening and counseling for intimate partner violence: A systematic review of practices and influencing factors., Trauma Violence Abuse, 18, 479, 10.1177/1524838016637080 · DOI
  36. Vittes, 2013, Removing guns from batterers: Findings from a pilot survey of domestic violence restraining order recipients in California., Violence Against Women, 19, 602, 10.1177/1077801213490561 · DOI
  37. Kirst, 2012, Referral to health and social services for intimate partner violence in health care settings: A realist scoping review., Trauma Violence Abuse, 13, 198, 10.1177/1524838012454942 · DOI
  38. Gielen, 2000, Women’s opinions about domestic violence screening and mandatory reporting., Am J Prev Med, 19, 279, 10.1016/S0749-3797(00)00234-8 · DOI
  39. Meindl, 2017, Mass shootings: The role of the media in promoting generalized imitation., Am J Public Health, 107, 368, 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303611 · DOI
  40. Gold, 2020, Domestic violence, firearms, and mass shootings., J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, 48, 35
  41. Laqueur, 2020, Identifying high-risk firearm owners to prevent mass violence., Criminol Public Policy, 19, 109, 10.1111/1745-9133.12477 · DOI
  42. Lowe, 2017, The mental health consequences of mass shootings., Trauma Violence Abuse, 18, 62, 10.1177/1524838015591572 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Kim, 2019, Social determinants of health in relation to firearm-related homicides in the United States: A nationwide multilevel cross-sectional study., PLoS Med, 16, e1002978, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002978 · DOI
  44. Crifasi, 2018, Correction to: Association between firearm laws and homicide in urban counties., J Urban Health, 95, 773, 10.1007/s11524-018-0306-y · DOI
  45. McCourt, 2020, Purchaser licensing, point-of-sale background check laws, and firearm homicide and suicide in 4 US states, 1985-2017., Am J Public Health, 110, 1546, 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305822 · DOI
  46. Rowhani-Rahbar, 2020, Extreme risk protection orders in Washington: A statewide descriptive study., Ann Intern Med, 173, 342, 10.7326/M20-0594 · DOI
  47. Mozaffarian, 2013, Curbing gun violence: Lessons from public health successes., JAMA, 309, 551, 10.1001/jama.2013.38 · DOI
  48. Cunningham, 2009, Before and after the trauma bay: The prevention of violent injury among youth., Ann Emerg Med, 53, 490, 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.11.014 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Purtle, 2013, Hospital-based violence intervention programs save lives and money., J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 75, 331, 10.1097/TA.0b013e318294f518 · DOI
  50. Drum, 2009, New data on the nature of suicidal crises in college students: Shifting the paradigm., Prof Psychol Res Practice, 40, 213, 10.1037/a0014465 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Simon, 2001, Characteristics of impulsive suicide attempts and attempters., Suicide Life Threat Behav, 32, 49
  52. Vyrostek, 2004, Surveillance for fatal and nonfatal injuries—United States, 2001., MMWR Surveill Summ, 53, 1
  53. Anestis, 2015, The association between state laws regulating handgun ownership and statewide suicide rates., Am J Public Health, 105, 2059, 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302465 · DOI
  54. Miller, 2007, Household firearm ownership and rates of suicide across the 50 United States., J Trauma, 62, 1029
  55. Nestadt, 2017, Urban-rural differences in suicide in the state of Maryland: The role of firearms., Am J Public Health, 107, 1548, 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303865 · DOI
  56. Stanley, 2012, Safety planning intervention: A brief intervention to mitigate suicide risk., Cognitive Behav Pract, 19, 256, 10.1016/j.cbpra.2011.01.001 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Betz, 2016, Lethal means access and assessment among suicidal emergency department patients., Depress Anxiety, 33, 502, 10.1002/da.22486 · DOI
  58. Betz, 2019, ‘Lock to Live’: Development of a firearm storage decision aid to enhance lethal means counselling and prevent suicide., Inj Prev, 25, i18, 10.1136/injuryprev-2018-042944 · DOI
  59. Gibbons, 2020, Legal liability for returning firearms to suicidal persons who voluntarily surrender them in 50 US states., Am J Public Health, 110, 685, 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305545 · DOI
  60. McCourt, 2017, Temporary transfer of firearms from the home to prevent suicide: Legal obstacles and recommendations., JAMA Intern Med, 177, 96, 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.5704 · DOI
  61. Frattaroli, 2019, Assessment of physician self-reported knowledge and use of Maryland’s extreme risk protection order law., JAMA Netw Open, 2, e1918037, 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18037 · DOI
  62. Swanson, 2017, Implementation and effectiveness of Connecticut’s risk-based gun removal law: Does it prevent suicides?, Law Contemp Probs, 80, 179
  63. Barry, 2018, Public support for gun violence prevention policies among gun owners and non-gun owners in 2017., Am J Public Health, 108, 878, 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304432 · DOI
  64. Beard, 2017, Quantifying disparities in urban firearm violence by race and place in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: A cartographic study., Am J Public Health, 107, 371, 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303620 · DOI
  65. Hemenway, 2019, Variation in rates of fatal police shootings across US States: The role of firearm availability., J Urban Health, 96, 63, 10.1007/s11524-018-0313-z · DOI
  66. Grossman, 1995, Firearm injury prevention counseling by pediatricians and family physicians. Practices and beliefs., Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, 149, 973, 10.1001/archpedi.1995.02170220039005 · DOI

Cited by

See all 35

Metadata

Authors
Hoops, K., Fahimi, J., Khoeur, L., Studenmund, C., Barber, C., Barnhorst, A., Betz, M. E., Crifasi, C. K., Davis, J. A., Dewispelaere, W., Fisher, L., Howard, P. K., Ketterer, A., Marcolini, E., Nestadt, P. S., Rozel, J., Simonetti, J. A., Spitzer, S., Victoroff, M., Williams, B. H., Howley, L., & Ranney, M. L.
Venue
Academic Medicine
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2021-07-06
Volume
97
Issue
1
Pages
93-104
ISSN
1040-2446
DOI
10.1097/acm.0000000000004226
Cited by
35
References
8
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.