Cited by 54Innovations in Medical EducationEducational Leadership and InnovationHealth and Medical Education

Promoting Self-Directed Learning Skills in Residency: A Case Study in Program Development

Open access
Nothnagle, Melissa, Goldman, Roberta, Quirk, Mark, Reis, Shmuel·2010·Academic Medicine

Abstract

Self-directed learning (SDL) skills are essential for the formation and ongoing competence of today's physicians who work in the context of expanding scientific knowledge and changing health care systems. In 2007-2008, the authors developed a program to promote SDL in the Brown University Family Medicine Residency. Through an iterative process, the project team juggled learning theories (i.e., Knowles' SDL model, Collins' cognitive apprenticeship model, and Quirk's expertise development model) with curricular goals, instructional options, and local constraints to design a practical and theoretically robust intervention.The intervention that emerged from this process features a faculty physician serving as a learning coach who meets individually each month with all second-year residents to assist them in generating learning goals, reflecting on their learning experiences, and practicing evidence-based medicine (EBM) skills. An electronic portfolio serves as a documentation tool that supports reflection; residents record their goals and reflections in the portfolio, which also contains their formative assessments, procedure logs, and special projects. To address the hidden curriculum, the program designers took special care to avoid increasing faculty and resident workload and created a forum for discussion and group reflection. Program evaluation combines qualitative and quantitative methods, such as surveys of and interviews with residents and faculty, to assess changes in residents' SDL and EBM skills and in the program's educational culture. The authors use Kern and colleagues' six-step model for curriculum development to describe both the unfolding of this complex project and the choices that resulted in the current program design.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/acm.0b013e3181fa02a4

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nothnagle, M., Goldman, R., Quirk, M., & Reis, S.
Affiliations
Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Nothnagle, Melissa
Venue
Academic Medicine
Published
2010-12
Volume
85
Issue
12
Pages
1874-1879
ISSN
1040-2446 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2015651866
Cited by
54
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Academic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship@UMassChan (submittedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (D58HP08298)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Leadership and Innovation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Education
Keywords
self-directed learning, family medicine residency, learning coaches, e-portfolio, reflection, hidden curriculum, curriculum development, cognitive apprenticeship, formative assessment, program evaluation, educational culture
MeSH terms
Clinical Competence, Curriculum, Educational Measurement, Humans, Internship and Residency, Learning, Students, Medical, Program Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review