Cited by 121Innovations in Medical EducationPsychometric Methodologies and TestingEducational Leadership and Innovation

The Self‐Directed Learning Readiness Scale: a factor analysis study

Hoban, J Dennis, Lawson, Sonya R, Mazmanian, Paul E, Best, Al M, Seibel, Hugo R·2005·Medical Education

Abstract

Background The practice of medicine demands that its physician practitioners are self‐directed, life‐long learners. The Self‐Directed Learning Readiness Scale (SDLRS) intends to measure adults' readiness to engage in self‐directed learning. Purpose The present study assesses the underlying factor structure of the SDLRS for a sample of entering medical students. Methods Over a period of 6 years, 972 first year medical students at the Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine completed the SDLRS. To summarise the inter‐relationships among variables, a principal axis factor analysis with oblique rotation was used on the 58 SDLRS items. A series of confirmatory factor analyses using LISREL 8.54 was performed to further examine the measurement model underlying the SDLRS. Results A 4‐factor confirmatory model representing 4 correlated substantive factors and a reverse coding method factor fits these data well. Conclusions Medical educators should hold limited expectations of the SDLRS to measure medical students' readiness to engage in self‐directed learning. The definitions and theoretical assumptions that inform readiness for self‐directed learning should be reconsidered. Alternative approaches to studying self‐directed learning should be explored.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02140.x

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoban, J. D., Lawson, S. R., Mazmanian, P. E., Best, A. M., & Seibel, H. R.
Affiliations
Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Corresponding author
Hoban, J Dennis
Venue
Medical Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-03-24
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
370-379
ISSN
  • 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2923
OpenAlex
W2154828930
Cited by
121
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Leadership and Innovation
Keywords
Self-Directed Learning Readiness Scale, self-directed learning, readiness to learn, factor structure, medical students, lifelong learning, scale validation, measurement model
MeSH terms
Education, Medical, Continuing, Educational Measurement, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Humans, Learning, Students, Medical, Personal Autonomy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review