Cited by 226Healthcare Technology and Patient MonitoringPatient Safety and Medication ErrorsElectronic Health Records Systems

Alarm fatigue: impacts on patient safety

Ruskin, Keith J., Hueske-Kraus, Dirk·2015·Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Electronic medical devices are an integral part of patient care. As new devices are introduced, the number of alarms to which a healthcare professional may be exposed may be as high as 1000 alarms per shift. The US Food and Drug Administration has reported over 500 alarm-related patient deaths in five years. The Joint Commission, recognizing the clinical significance of alarm fatigue, has made clinical alarm management a National Patient Safety Goal. RECENT FINDINGS: Potential solutions to alarm fatigue include technical, organizational, and educational interventions. Selecting only the right monitors (i.e., avoiding overmonitoring), judicious selection of alarm limits, and multimodal alarms can all reduce the number of nuisance alarms to which a healthcare worker is exposed. SUMMARY: Alarm fatigue can jeopardize safety, but some clinical solutions such as setting appropriate thresholds and avoiding overmonitoring are available.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aco.0000000000000260

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ruskin, K. J., & Hueske-Kraus, D.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Ruskin, Keith J.
Venue
Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology
Published
2015-12
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
685-690
ISSN
0952-7907 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2416677955
Cited by
226
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7
FWCI
9.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
alarm fatigue, clinical alarm systems, electronic medical devices, patient safety, alarm management, alarm thresholds, National Patient Safety Goals
MeSH terms
Fatigue, Humans, Monitoring, Physiologic, Noise, United States, Clinical Alarms, Patient Safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review