The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of Microneedle Design on Pain in Human Volunteers
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: To design microneedles that minimize pain, this study tested the hypothesis that microneedles cause significantly less pain than a 26-gauge hypodermic needle, and that decreasing microneedle length and the number of microneedles reduces pain in normal human volunteers. METHODS: Single microneedles with lengths ranging from 480 to 1450 microm, widths from 160 to 465 microm, thicknesses from 30 to 100 microm, and tip angles from 20 to 90 degrees; and arrays containing 5 or 50 microneedles were inserted into the volar forearms of 10 healthy, human volunteers in a double-blinded, randomized study. Visual analog scale pain scores were recorded and compared with each other and to the pain from a 26-gauge hypodermic needle. RESULTS: All microneedles investigated were significantly less painful than the hypodermic needle with microneedle pain scores varying from 5% to 40% of the hypodermic needle. Microneedle length had the strongest effect on pain, where a 3-fold increase in length increased the pain score by 7-fold. The number of microneedles also affected the pain score, where a 10-fold increase in the number of microneedles increased pain just over 2-fold. Microneedle tip angle, thickness, and width did not significantly influence pain. DISCUSSION: Microneedles are significantly less painful than a 26-gauge hypodermic needle over the range of dimensions investigated. Decreasing microneedle length and number of microneedles reduces pain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McAllister, D. V., Wang, P. M., Davis, S. P., Park, J.-H., Canatella, P. J., Allen, M. G., & Prausnitz, M. R. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2331316100 · Cited by 859
Self-citation
Cited by
Microneedles for drug and vaccine delivery
Kim, Y.-C., Park, J.-H., & Prausnitz, M. R. (2012) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.04.005 · Cited by 1,760
Self-citationDissolving polymer microneedle patches for influenza vaccination
Sullivan, S. P., Koutsonanos, D. G., del Pilar Martin, M., Lee, J. W., Zarnitsyn, V., Choi, S.-O., Murthy, N., Compans, R. W., Skountzou, I., & Prausnitz, M. R. (2010) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.2182 · Cited by 948
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gill, H. S., Denson, D. D., Burris, B. A., & Prausnitz, M. R.
- Venue
- The Clinical Journal of Pain
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 585-594
- ISSN
- 0749-8047 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2409984077
- Cited by
- 701
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Microneedle Design on Pain in Human Volunteers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/ajp.0b013e31816778f9
- The paper
- Gill, H. S., Denson, D. D., Burris, B. A., & Prausnitz, M. R. (2008). Effect of Microneedle Design on Pain in Human Volunteers. The Clinical Journal of Pain. https://doi.org/10.1097/ajp.0b013e31816778f9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.