Cited by 156Anesthesia and Sedative AgentsSleep and Wakefulness ResearchAnesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research

Electrical stimulation of the ventral tegmental area induces reanimation from general anesthesia

Open access
Solt, Ken, Van Dort, Christa J., Chemali, Jessica J., Taylor, Norman E., Kenny, Jonathan D., Brown, Emery N.·2014·Anesthesiology

Abstract

Background: Methylphenidate or a D1 dopamine receptor agonist induces reanimation (active emergence) from general anesthesia. The authors tested whether electrical stimulation of dopaminergic nuclei also induces reanimation from general anesthesia. Methods: In adult rats, a bipolar insulated stainless steel electrode was placed in the ventral tegmental area (VTA, n = 5) or substantia nigra (n = 5). After a minimum 7-day recovery period, the isoflurane dose sufficient to maintain loss of righting was established. Electrical stimulation was initiated and increased in intensity every 3 min to a maximum of 120 µA. If stimulation restored the righting reflex, an additional experiment was performed at least 3 days later during continuous propofol anesthesia. Histological analysis was conducted to identify the location of the electrode tip. In separate experiments, stimulation was performed in the prone position during general anesthesia with isoflurane or propofol, and the electroencephalogram was recorded. Results: To maintain loss of righting, the dose of isoflurane was 0.9% ± 0.1 vol%, and the target plasma dose of propofol was 4.4 ± 1.1 µg/ml (mean ± SD). In all rats with VTA electrodes, electrical stimulation induced a graded arousal response including righting that increased with current intensity. VTA stimulation induced a shift in electroencephalogram peak power from δ (<4 Hz) to θ (4–8 Hz). In all rats with substantia nigra electrodes, stimulation did not elicit an arousal response or significant electroencephalogram changes. Conclusions: Electrical stimulation of the VTA, but not the substantia nigra, induces reanimation during general anesthesia with isoflurane or propofol. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that dopamine release by VTA neurons, but not substantia nigra neurons, induces reanimation from general anesthesia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aln.0000000000000117

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Causal reactivation of some wake-promoting neurons during emergence has been explored with electrical, optogenetic, and chemogenetic methods in rodents and suggested in humans.

    “the causal reactivation of some wake-promoting neurons during emergence from the anesthetic state has been explored using approaches such as electrical stimulation, optogenetics, and chemogenetics [115–118] in rodents and suggested in humans [119].”

    From The Biology of General Anesthesia from Paramecium to Primate (2019) · cites this paper as [117]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Solt, K., Van Dort, C. J., Chemali, J. J., Taylor, N. E., Kenny, J. D., & Brown, E. N.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (US)
Corresponding author
Solt, Ken
Venue
Anesthesiology
Published
2014-08
Volume
121
Issue
2
Pages
311-319
ISSN
0003-3022 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1967982683
Cited by
156
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6
FWCI
14.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Anesthesiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PMC
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (DP1OD003646)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM104948, TR01-GM104948, K08GM094394, T32GM007592)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
Keywords
electrical stimulation, ventral tegmental area, substantia nigra, emergence from anesthesia, dopamine release, isoflurane, propofol, arousal, EEG
MeSH terms
Anesthesia Recovery Period, Anesthesia, General, Anesthesia, Intravenous, Animals, Arousal, Dopamine, Electric Stimulation, Electrodes, Implanted, Electroencephalography, Male, Receptors, Dopamine, Reflex, Substantia Nigra, Propofol, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Ventral Tegmental Area, Anesthetics, Intravenous, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review