Cited by 177Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchAnesthesia and Sedative AgentsNeural dynamics and brain function

Differential Role of Prefrontal and Parietal Cortices in Controlling Level of Consciousness

Open access
Pal, Dinesh, Dean, Jon G., Liu, Tiecheng, Li, Duan, Watson, Christopher J., Hudetz, Anthony G., Mashour, George A.·2018·Current Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Consciousness is determined both by level (e.g., being awake versus being anesthetized) and content (i.e., the qualitative aspects of experience). Subcortical areas are known to play a causal role in regulating the level of consciousness [1-9], but the role of the cortex is less well understood. Clinical and correlative data have been used both to support and refute a role for prefrontal and posterior cortices in the level of consciousness [10-22]. The prefrontal cortex has extensive reciprocal connections to wake-promoting centers in the brainstem and diencephalon [23, 24], and hence is in a unique position to modulate level of consciousness. Furthermore, a recent study suggested that the prefrontal cortex might be important in regulating level of consciousness [25] but causal evidence, and a comparison with more posterior cortical sites, is lacking. Therefore, to test the hypothesis that prefrontal cortex plays a role in regulating level of consciousness, we attempted to reverse sevoflurane anesthesia by cholinergic or noradrenergic stimulation of the prefrontal prelimbic cortex and two areas of parietal cortex in rat. General anesthesia was defined by loss of the righting reflex, a widely used surrogate measure in rodents. We demonstrate that cholinergic stimulation of prefrontal cortex, but not parietal cortex, restored wake-like behavior, despite continuous exposure to clinically relevant concentrations of sevoflurane anesthesia. Noradrenergic stimulation of the prefrontal and parietal areas resulted in electroencephalographic activation but failed to produce any signs of wake-like behavior. We conclude that cholinergic mechanisms in prefrontal cortex can regulate the level of consciousness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2018.05.025

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In rats anesthetized with sevoflurane, cholinergic manipulation of the medial prefrontal cortex, but not two posterior parietal cortex areas, restored wakefulness despite continuous anesthetic.

    “In rats anesthetized with clinically relevant concentrations of sevoflurane anesthesia, cholinergic manipulation of the medial prefrontal cortex—but not two areas of the posterior parietal cortex—was sufficient to restore wakefulness despite continuous administration of the general anesthetic (Pal et al., 2018).”

    From Conscious Processing and the Global Neuronal Workspace Hypothesis (2020) · cites this paper as Pal et al., 2018

    The Results report that carbachol stimulation of prefrontal prelimbic cortex produced wake-like behavior during continuous, clinically relevant sevoflurane exposure, whereas stimulation of the two tested parietal regions did not. But the parietal Results section identifies those regions as the posterior parietal cortex and the medial parietal association cortex—not two areas of the posterior parietal cortex. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pal, D., Dean, J. G., Liu, T., Li, D., Watson, C. J., Hudetz, A. G., & Mashour, G. A.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Mashour, George A.
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-07
Volume
28
Issue
13
Pages
2145-2152.e5
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2794797278
Cited by
177
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 3
FWCI
9.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01GM098578)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
level of consciousness, prefrontal cortex, parietal cortex, sevoflurane anesthesia, cholinergic stimulation, noradrenergic stimulation, prelimbic cortex, righting reflex, wakefulness, anesthesia reversal
MeSH terms
Sevoflurane, Acetylcholine, Adrenergic alpha-Agonists, Anesthesia, Animals, Consciousness, Male, Norepinephrine, Parietal Lobe, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Prefrontal Cortex, Cholinergic Agonists, Anesthetics, Inhalation, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review