The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Avoidable Waste in the Production and Reporting of Research Evidence
Abstract
TEST 02 - Elsevier's Scopus, the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature. Search and access research from the science, technology, medicine, social sciences and arts and humanities fields.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias
Dwan, K., Altman, D. G., Arnaiz, J. A., Bloom, J., Chan, A.-W., Cronin, E., Decullier, E., Easterbrook, P. J., Von Elm, E., Gamble, C., et al. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003081 · Cited by 1,546
What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews?
Glasziou, P., Meats, E., Heneghan, C., & Shepperd, S. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39590.732037.47 · Cited by 614
Self-citationTime to publication for results of clinical trials
Hopewell, S., Clarke, M. J., Stewart, L., & Tierney, J. (2007) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.mr000011.pub2 · Cited by 243
Hewitt, C., Hahn, S., Torgerson, D. J., Watson, J., & Bland, J. M. (2005) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.38413.576713.ae · Cited by 176
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- Liberati, 2004, An unfinished trip through uncertainties., BMJ, 328, 531, 10.1136/bmj.328.7438.531 · DOI
- Scherer, 2007, Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts., Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2, MR000005
- Garattini, 2009, Patients and the public deserve big changes in evaluation of drugs., BMJ, 338, 804, 10.1136/bmj.b1025 · DOI
- Gross, 1999, The relation between funding by the National Institutes of Health and the burden of disease., N Engl J Med, 340, 1914, 10.1056/NEJM199906173402406 · DOI · Paper page
- Stuckler, 2008, WHO’s budgetary allocations and burden of disease: a comparative analysis., Lancet, 372, 1563, 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61656-6 · DOI · Paper page
- Perel, 2008, Relation between the global burden of disease and randomized clinical trials conducted in Latin America published in the five leading medical journals., PLoS ONE, 3, e1696, 10.1371/journal.pone.0001696 · DOI
- Tallon, 2000, Relation between agendas of the research community and the research consumer., Lancet, 355, 2037, 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02351-5 · DOI · Paper page
- Chalmers, 2003, Descriptive survey of non-commercial randomised controlled trials in the United Kingdom, 1980-2002., BMJ, 327, 1017, 10.1136/bmj.327.7422.1017 · DOI
- Hewlett, 2006, Patients and professionals as research partners: challenges, practicalities and benefits., Arthritis Rheum, 55, 676, 10.1002/art.22091 · DOI · Paper page
- Cooper, 2005, The use of systematic reviews when designing studies., Clin Trials, 2, 260, 10.1191/1740774505cn090oa · DOI
- Patsopoulos, 2005, Relative citation impact of various study designs in the health sciences., JAMA, 293, 2362, 10.1001/jama.293.19.2362 · DOI · Paper page
- Mallett, 2003, How many Cochrane reviews are needed to cover existing evidence on the effects of health care interventions?, ACP J Club, 139, A11, 10.7326/ACPJC-2003-139-1-A11 · DOI
- Rutjes, 2006, Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies., CMAJ, 174, 469, 10.1503/cmaj.050090 · DOI · Paper page
- Chalmers, 2006, From optimism to disillusion about commitment to transparency in the medico-industrial complex., J R Soc Med, 99, 337, 10.1177/014107680609900715 · doi:10.1177/014107680609900715
- Hopewell, 2008, Publication bias in clinical trials., Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2, MR000006
- Young, 2005, Putting clinical trials into context., Lancet, 366, 107, 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66846-8 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Hoffmann, T. C., Glasziou, P. P., Boutron, I., Milne, R., Perera, R., Moher, D., Altman, D. G., Barbour, V., Macdonald, H., Johnston, M., et al. (2014) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g1687 · Cited by 10,548
Self-citationRadiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data
Gillies, R. J., Kinahan, P. E., & Hricak, H. (2016) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2015151169 · Cited by 8,421
Improving bioscience research reporting: The ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research
Kilkenny, C., Browne, W. J., Cuthill, I. C., Emerson, M., & Altman, D. G. (2010) · Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics · doi:10.4103/0976-500x.72351 · Cited by 6,277
Skivington, K., Matthews, L., Simpson, S. A., Craig, P., Baird, J., Blazeby, J. M., Boyd, K. A., Craig, N., French, D. P., McIntosh, E., et al. (2021) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.n2061 · Cited by 5,808
SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials
Chan, A.-W., Tetzlaff, J. M., Gotzsche, P. C., Altman, D. G., Mann, H., Berlin, J. A., Dickersin, K., Hrobjartsson, A., Schulz, K. F., Parulekar, W. R., et al. (2013) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.e7586 · Cited by 6,251
Metadata
- Authors
- Chalmers, I., & Glasziou, P.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2009-12
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1341-1345
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2330575852
- Cited by
- 600
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 19.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Avoidable Waste in the Production and Reporting of Research Evidence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/aog.0b013e3181c3020d
- The paper
- Chalmers, I., & Glasziou, P. (2009). Avoidable Waste in the Production and Reporting of Research Evidence. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0b013e3181c3020d
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
