Cited by 454Menopause: Health Impacts and TreatmentsCancer Risks and FactorsUterine Myomas and Treatments

Long-Term Mortality Associated With Oophorectomy Compared With Ovarian Conservation in the Nurses' Health Study

Open access
Parker, William H., Feskanich, Diane, Broder, Michael S., Chang, Eunice, Shoupe, Donna, Farquhar, Cynthia M., Berek, Jonathan S., Manson, JoAnn E.·2013·Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report long-term mortality after oophorectomy or ovarian conservation at the time of hysterectomy in subgroups of women based on age at the time of surgery, use of estrogen therapy, presence of risk factors for coronary heart disease, and length of follow-up. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of 30,117 Nurses' Health Study participants undergoing hysterectomy for benign disease. Multivariable adjusted hazard ratios for death from coronary heart disease, stroke, breast cancer, epithelial ovarian cancer, lung cancer, colorectal cancer, total cancer, and all causes were determined comparing bilateral oophorectomy (n=16,914) with ovarian conservation (n=13,203). RESULTS: Over 28 years of follow-up, 16.8% of women with hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy died from all causes compared with 13.3% of women who had ovarian conservation (hazard ratio 1.13, 95% confidence interval 1.06-1.21). Oophorectomy was associated with a lower risk of death from ovarian cancer (four women with oophorectomy compared with 44 women with ovarian conservation) and, before age 47.5 years, a lower risk of death from breast cancer. However, at no age was oophorectomy associated with a lower risk of other cause-specific or all-cause mortality. For women younger than 50 years at the time of hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy was associated with significantly increased mortality in women who had never used estrogen therapy but not in past and current users: assuming a 35-year lifespan after oophorectomy: number needed to harm for all-cause death=8, coronary heart disease death=33, and lung cancer death=50. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral oophorectomy is associated with increased mortality in women aged younger than 50 years who never used estrogen therapy and at no age is oophorectomy associated with increased survival. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aog.0b013e3182864350

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Treatments for endometriosis, including hysterectomy or oophorectomy and analgesics, may increase the risk of coronary heart disease in women with endometriosis.

    “In addition, the treatments of endometriosis, such as hysterectomy or oophorectomy (20-24) and analgesics (25) may confer increased risk of CHD to women with endometriosis.”

    From Endometriosis and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease (2016) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Results (page not available) associate bilateral oophorectomy at hysterectomy with higher CHD mortality, and the Introduction reports an earlier finding of higher incident CHD. The paper does not establish this association specifically in women with endometriosis or for hysterectomy without oophorectomy. The sentence cites a different source for analgesics, so that part is not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Bilateral oophorectomy at ages younger than 50 has been associated with increased incidence and mortality of cardiovascular diseases, although results have been inconclusive for bilateral oophorectomy at ages older than 50.

    “bilateral oophorectomy at ages younger than 50 has been associated with an increased incidence and mortality of cardiovascular diseases, although results have been inconclusive for bilateral oophorectomy at ages older than 50.(20-22)”

    From Endometriosis and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease (2016) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Results report increased coronary heart disease mortality among women who had oophorectomy before age 50. They do not establish increased cardiovascular disease incidence, and the paper focuses on mortality after hysterectomy rather than incidence. For older women, the Results say CVD mortality estimates remained elevated at age 60 and above, although mortality outcomes did not differ statistically when stratified by age; this supports uncertainty about an age-specific effect, not a clear older-than-50 contrast. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Surgically induced menopause before natural menopause may increase coronary heart disease risk, and this elevated risk may be most evident at younger ages.

    “The surgically-induced menopause prior to a natural menopause may increase risk of CHD among women, and this elevated risk may be most evident at a younger age (i.e., before all women reach natural menopause). (20-24)”

    From Endometriosis and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease (2016) · cites this paper as [22]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parker, W. H., Feskanich, D., Broder, M. S., Chang, E., Shoupe, D., Farquhar, C. M., Berek, J. S., & Manson, J. E.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Venue
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2013-04
Volume
121
Issue
4
Pages
709-716
ISSN
0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2111012335
Cited by
454
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 18
FWCI
28.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL34594, R01HL034594)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA-87969, P01CA087969)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
Keywords
bilateral oophorectomy, ovarian preservation, hysterectomy, long-term mortality, estrogen therapy, coronary artery disease, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, lung cancer, colorectal cancer, number needed to harm, age at surgery, Nurses' Health Study
MeSH terms
Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cause of Death, Female, Humans, Hysterectomy, Middle Aged, Ovariectomy, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review