Cited by 47Hearing Loss and RehabilitationHearing Impairment and CommunicationHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics

Effort and displeasure in people who are hard of hearing.

Matthen, Mohan·2016·Ear & Hearing

Abstract

Listening effort helps explain why people who are hard of hearing are prone to fatigue and social withdrawal. However, a one-factor model that cites only effort due to hardness of hearing is insufficient as there are many who lead happy lives despite their disability. This article explores other contributory factors, in particular motivational arousal and pleasure. The theory of rational motivational arousal predicts that some people forego listening comprehension because they believe it to be impossible and hence worth no effort at all. This is problematic. Why should the listening task be rated this way, given the availability of aids that reduce its difficulty? Two additional factors narrow the explanatory gap. First, we separate the listening task from the benefit derived as a consequence. The latter is temporally more distant, and is discounted as a result. The second factor is displeasure attributed to the listening task, which increases listening cost. Many who are hard of hearing enjoy social interaction. In such cases, the actual activity of listening is a benefit, not a cost. These people also reap the benefits of listening, but do not have to balance these against the displeasure of the task. It is suggested that if motivational harmony can be induced by training in somebody who is hard of hearing, then the obstacle to motivational arousal would be removed. This suggests a modified goal for health care professionals. Do not just teach those who are hard of hearing how to use hearing assistance devices. Teach them how to do so with pleasure and enjoyment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aud.0000000000000292

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pleasure in anticipation of and during performing a task can be motivating.

    “Similarly, (dis)pleasure can predispose effort insofar as pleasure in anticipation of and during performing a task can be motivating (Matthen 2016, this issue, pp. 28S-34S).”
  • Listeners conduct a cost-benefit analysis to evaluate the net benefit from effort expended relative to the costs of or demands for the allocation of cognitive capacity.

    “The thinking behind our FUEL was highly influenced by the notion that listening has a value and that listeners conduct a cost-benefit analysis to evalu -ate the net benefit from effort expended relative to the costs of or demands for the allocation of cognitive capacity (Brehm & Self 1989; see Matthen 2016, this issue, pp. 28S-34S; Richter 2016, this issue, pp. 111S-117S).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Matthen, M.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Matthen, Mohan
Venue
Ear & Hearing
Published
2016-07
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
28S-34S
ISSN
0196-0202 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2472877191
Cited by
47
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5
FWCI
2.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ear and Hearing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Hearing Impairment and Communication
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Keywords
hard of hearing, listening effort, pleasure, displeasure, listening fatigue, social withdrawal, hearing aids, delay discounting
MeSH terms
Arousal, Humans, Motivation, Psychological Theory, Hearing Loss, Pleasure, Delay Discounting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review