Cited by 84Hearing Loss and RehabilitationHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsNeuroscience and Music Perception

The Moderating Effect of Success Importance on the Relationship Between Listening Demand and Listening Effort

Open access
Richter, Michael·2016·Ear & Hearing

Abstract

A common element of the psychophysiological research on listening effort is the focus on listening demand as determinant of effort. The article discusses preceding studies and theorizing on effort to show that the link between listening demand and listening effort is moderated by various variables. Moreover, I will present a recent study that examined the joint effect of listening demand and success importance on effort-related cardiovascular reactivity in an auditory discrimination task. Results for pre-ejection period reactivity-an indicator of sympathetic activity-supported the hypothesis that the relationship between listening demand and listening effort is moderated by other variables: Pre-ejection period reactivity was higher in the high-demand-high-success-importance condition than in the other three conditions. This new finding as well as the findings of previous research on effort suggest that a broader perspective on the determinants of listening effort is warranted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aud.0000000000000295

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Listeners conduct a cost-benefit analysis to evaluate the net benefit from effort expended relative to the costs of or demands for the allocation of cognitive capacity.

    “The thinking behind our FUEL was highly influenced by the notion that listening has a value and that listeners conduct a cost-benefit analysis to evalu -ate the net benefit from effort expended relative to the costs of or demands for the allocation of cognitive capacity (Brehm & Self 1989; see Matthen 2016, this issue, pp. 28S-34S; Richter 2016, this issue, pp. 111S-117S).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Richter, M.
Affiliations
Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
Corresponding author
Richter, Michael
Venue
Ear & Hearing
Published
2016-07
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
111S-117S
ISSN
0196-0202 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2463021669
Cited by
84
References
47
Citations by year
2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7
FWCI
4.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Ear and Hearing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Liverpool John Moores University (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Keywords
listening effort, pre-ejection period, cardiovascular reactivity, sympathetic activity, auditory discrimination
MeSH terms
Auditory Perception, Blood Pressure, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Pitch Discrimination, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review