The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Maternal Contributions: Supporting Language Development in Young Children with Cochlear Implants
Abstract
In Brief Objective: The principal goal of this study was to investigate the relationships between maternal contributions (e.g., involvement, self-efficacy, linguistic input) and receptive and expressive (oral and sign) language skills in young children with cochlear implants. Design: Relationships between maternal contributions and children's language skills were investigated by using correlation and regression analyses. Thirty-two mothers (mean age = 36.0 yr) and their children (mean age = 4.8 yr) were videotaped during free play and storybook interactions. Mothers' and children's quantitative (MLU, number of word-types) and mothers' qualitative (facilitative language techniques) linguistic input were analyzed. Mothers completed a measurement tool specifically designed to quantify their sense of involvement and self-efficacy (Scale of Parental Involvement and Self-Efficacy). The Reynell Developmental Language Scales and data from videotaped transcription analyses were used to evaluate children's oral and sign language skills. Results: Maternal involvement and self-efficacy relating to children's speech-language development were positively related to mothers' quantitative and qualitative linguistic input. After controlling for child's age, mothers' MLU and two facilitative language techniques (recast and open-ended question) were positively related to children's language skills. Conclusions: The performance of young implant users may vary in part because of their mothers' sense of involvement and self-efficacy, as well as the ways in which mothers interact with their children. Given this information, it would be fruitful for professionals working with these families to incorporate goals that enhance caregivers' involvement, self-efficacy, and linguistic input to better support language development in young children after cochlear implantation. This study investigated the relationship between maternal contributions and oral and expressive language skills in young children with cochlear implants. Thirty-two mothers and their children were videotaped during free play and storybook interactions. Mothers' and children's quantitative (MLU, number of wordtypes) and mothers' qualitative (facilitative language techniques) linguistic input were analyzed. In general, results showed that qualitative and quantitative maternal involvement was positively related to children's language skills. Thus the performance of young implant users may vary in part because of their mothers' sense of involvement and self-efficacy, as well as the ways in which mothers interact with their children.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158 · Cited by 46,835
Self-efficacy: the exercise of control
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-1826 · Cited by 24,281
Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experience of Young American Children
Panagos, R. J. (1998) · Remedial and Special Education · doi:10.1177/074193259801900609 · Cited by 4,173
Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experience of Young American Children
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-3435 · Cited by 4,103
The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk
MacWhinney, B. (1992) · Child Language Teaching and Therapy · doi:10.1177/026565909200800211 · Cited by 3,396
The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk
Pye, C., & MacWhinney, B. (1994) · Language · doi:10.2307/416745 · Cited by 2,301
Regulation of cognitive processes through perceived self-efficacy.
Bandura, A. (1989) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.25.5.729 · Cited by 1,900 · cited 4×
“Embedded in social learning theory, self-efficacy refers to the belief in one’s ability to perform a particular task successfully (Bandura, 1989).”
BackgroundInfluentialA reinterpretation of the direction of effects in studies of socialization.
Bell, R. Q. (1968) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0025583 · Cited by 1,873
Joint attention and early language
Tomasello, M., & Farrar, M. J. (1986) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1130423 · Cited by 1,822
Joint Attention and Early Language
Tomasello, M., & Farrar, M. J. (1986) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1986.tb00470.x · Cited by 1,815
Cited by
SUSKIND, D. L., LEFFEL, K. R., GRAF, E., HERNANDEZ, M. W., GUNDERSON, E. A., SAPOLICH, S. G., SUSKIND, E., LEININGER, L., GOLDIN-MEADOW, S., & LEVINE, S. C. (2016) · Journal of Child Language · doi:10.1017/s0305000915000033 · Cited by 335
The Modes of Communication Used by Children With Cochlear Implants and Role of Sign in Their Lives
Hyde, M., & Punch, R. (2011) · American Annals of the Deaf · doi:10.1353/aad.2011.0006 · Cited by 99
Metadata
- Authors
- DesJardin, J. L., & Eisenberg, L. S.
- Venue
- Ear & Hearing
- Published
- 2007-08
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 456-469
- ISSN
- 0196-0202 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2008314071
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 60
- FWCI
- 9.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Maternal Contributions: Supporting Language Development in Young Children with Cochlear Implants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/aud.0b013e31806dc1ab
- The paper
- DesJardin, J. L., & Eisenberg, L. S. (2007). Maternal Contributions: Supporting Language Development in Young Children with Cochlear Implants. Ear & Hearing. https://doi.org/10.1097/aud.0b013e31806dc1ab
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.