Cited by 204Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationEmergency and Acute Care StudiesSpine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology

Diagnostic Testing and Treatment of Low Back Pain in United States Emergency Departments: A National Perspective

Open access
Friedman, Benjamin W., Chilstrom, Mikaela, Bijur, Polly E., Gallagher, E. John·2010·Spine

Abstract

In Brief Study Design. This study is an analysis of the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS), a large sample representative of all emergency department (ED) visits throughout the United States. Objective. To use NHAMCS to describe the frequency of ED visits for the treatment of low back pain, and the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies employed by emergency clinicians. Summary of Background Data. Low back pain is common in the general population. While it accounts for 2.5% of all outpatient office visits, the role of the ED has yet to be described. Methods. We included cases if they had both a reason for visit related to back pain and a primary ED discharge ICD9 code consistent with low back pain. The outcomes included frequency of ED use, and frequency of various diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Individual patient visits are weighted so that data can be extrapolated to all ED visits throughout the United States. Results. Low back pain related disorders caused 2.63 million (95% CI: 2.32, 2.93 million) annual ED visits in the US. Of all patients with low back pain, 30.5% (28.1, 32.9) had a plain radiograph; 9.6% (95% CI: 7.2, 12.6) had a CT or MRI in 2006 compared with 3.2% (95% CI: 2.0, 5.1) in 2002 (P for trend <0.01). Age and type of insurance were associated with advanced imaging, though geographic region was not. Of medications either administered in the ED or prescribed at discharge, the most frequently used classes were opioids (61.0%, 95% CI: 58.4, 63.5), followed by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (49.9%, 95% CI: 47.2, 52.7) and muscle relaxants (43.1%, 95% CI: 40.4, 45.8). Conclusion. Low back pain related disorders are a frequent cause of ED visit. Diagnostic imaging is performed in one-third of all patients. There was a strong secular trend in use of advanced imaging; patients were nearly 3 times as likely to receive a CT or MRI in 2006 as they were 4 years earlier. Although opioids were administered or prescribed to two-thirds of patients, use of therapeutic agents was generally in keeping with guideline recommendations. We analyzed a representative sample of emergency department visits throughout the United States to describe the frequency of visits for the treatment of low back pain related disorders, and the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies employed. Low back pain related disorders are a frequent cause of emergency department visit. Diagnostic testing was performed in nearly half the patients. Use of therapeutic agents was generally in keeping with guideline recommendations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/brs.0b013e3181d952a5

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [2]Cassidy JD Carroll LJ Cote P The Saskatchewan health and back pain survey. The prevalence of low back pain and related disability in Saskatchewan adults Spine 1998 23 17 1860 1866 discussion 1867 9762743
  2. [9]Bigos SJ Acute Low Back Problems in Adults 1994 Vol. 14 Rockville, Maryland Agency for Health Care Policy and Research

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Friedman, B. W., Chilstrom, M., Bijur, P. E., & Gallagher, E. J.
Affiliations
Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Friedman, Benjamin W.
Venue
Spine
Published
2010-11
Volume
35
Issue
24
Pages
E1406-E1411
ISSN
0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2017820684
Cited by
204
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Spine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5k23ns051409-02)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K23 NS051409, 1K23NS051409)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Keywords
low back pain, emergency department visits, diagnostic imaging, opioids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, muscle relaxants, emergency department prescribing, guideline adherence, health insurance, National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Ambulatory Care, Analgesics, Diagnostic Imaging, Drug Utilization, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Humans, Insurance, Health, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Patient Discharge, Drug Prescriptions, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, United States, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Treatment Outcome, Low Back Pain, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Health Care Surveys, Guideline Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review