Cited by 34Thermal Regulation in MedicineThermoregulation and physiological responsesHemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy

Accuracy of Zero-Heat-Flux Cutaneous Temperature in Intensive Care Adults

Dahyot-Fizelier, Claire, Lamarche, Solène, Kerforne, Thomas, Bénard, Thierry, Giraud, Benoit, Bellier, Rémy, Carise, Elsa, Frasca, Denis +1 more·2017·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

Objectives: To compare accuracy of a continuous noninvasive cutaneous temperature using zero-heat-flux method to esophageal temperature and arterial temperature. Design: Prospective study. Setting: ICU and NeuroICU, University Hospital. Patients: Fifty-two ICU patients over a 4-month period who required continuous temperature monitoring were included in the study, after informed consent. Interventions: All patients had esophageal temperature probe and a noninvasive cutaneous device to monitor their core temperature continuously. In seven patients who required cardiac output monitoring, continuous iliac arterial temperature was collected. Simultaneous core temperatures were recorded from 1 to 5 days. Comparison to the esophageal temperature, considered as the reference in this study, used the Bland and Altman method with adjustment for multiple measurements per patient. Measurements and Main Results: The esophageal temperature ranged from 33°C to 39.7°C, 61,298 pairs of temperature using zero-heat-flux and esophageal temperature were collected and 1,850 triple of temperature using zero-heat-flux, esophageal temperature, and arterial temperature. Bias and limits of agreement for temperature using zero-heat-flux were 0.19°C ± 0.53°C compared with esophageal temperature with an absolute difference of temperature pairs equal to or lower than 0.5°C of 92.6% (95% CI, 91.9–93.4%) of cases and equal to or lower than 1°C for 99.9% (95% CI, 99.7–100.0%) of cases. Compared with arterial temperature, bias and limits of agreement were –0.00°C ± 0.36°C with an absolute difference of temperature pairs equal to or lower than 0.5°C of 99.8% (95% CI, 95.3–100%) of cases. All absolute difference of temperature pairs between temperature using zero-heat-flux and arterial temperature and between arterial temperature and esophageal temperature were equal to or lower than 1°C. No local or systemic serious complication was observed. Conclusions: These results suggest a comparable reliability of the cutaneous sensor using the zero-heat-flux method compared with esophageal or iliac arterial temperatures measurements.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ccm.0000000000002317

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The sensor probe applied to the forehead is a highly accurate surrogate compared to nasopharyngeal, esophageal and artery temperatures.

    “Importantly, the sensor probe can be applied to the forehead, and has been shown to be highly accurate surrogate compared to nasopharyngeal20, esophageal23–27 and artery temperatures24.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dahyot-Fizelier, C., Lamarche, S., Kerforne, T., Bénard, T., Giraud, B., Bellier, R., Carise, E., Frasca, D., & Mimoz, O.
Affiliations
  • Université de Poitiers (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers (FR)
  • Inserm (FR)
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2017-07
Volume
45
Issue
7
Pages
e715-e717
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2606559610
Cited by
34
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Thermal Regulation in Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Keywords
skin temperature, core body temperature, esophageal temperature, non-invasive temperature monitoring, temperature measurement accuracy, intensive care unit patients, neurocritical care, cardiac output monitoring
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Body Temperature, Female, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Prospective Studies, Skin Temperature, Thermometers, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review