The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Diaphragm dysfunction assessed by ultrasonography: Influence on weaning from mechanical ventilation*
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of diaphragmatic dysfunction diagnosed by M-mode ultrasonography (vertical excursion <10 mm or paradoxic movements) in medical intensive care unit patients and to assess the influence of diaphragmatic dysfunction on weaning outcome. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: Twenty-eight-bed medical intensive care unit in a university-affiliated hospital. PATIENTS: Eighty-eight consecutive patients in the medical intensive care unit who required mechanical ventilation over 48 hrs and met the criteria for a spontaneous breathing trial were assessed. Patients with a history of diaphragmatic or neuromuscular disease or evidence of pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: During spontaneous breathing trial, each hemidiaphragm was evaluated by M-mode ultrasonography using the liver and spleen as windows with the patient supine. Rapid shallow breathing index was simultaneously calculated at the bedside. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The prevalence of ultrasonographic diaphragmatic dysfunction among the eligible 82 patients was 29% (n = 24). Patients with diaphragmatic dysfunction had longer weaning time (401 [range, 226-612] hrs vs. 90 [range, 24-309] hrs, p < .01) and total ventilation time (576 [range, 374-850] hrs vs. 203 [range, 109-408] hrs, p < .01) than patients without diaphragmatic dysfunction. Patients with diaphragmatic dysfunction also had higher rates of primary (20 of 24 vs. 34 of 58, p < .01) and secondary (ten of 20 vs. ten of 46, p = .01) weaning failures than patients without diaphragmatic dysfunction. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of ultrasonographic criteria in predicting weaning failure was similar to that of rapid shallow breathing index. CONCLUSIONS: Using M-mode ultrasonography, diaphragmatic dysfunction was found in a substantial number of medical intensive care unit patients without histories of diaphragmatic disease. Patients with such diaphragmatic dysfunction showed frequent early and delayed weaning failures. Ultrasonography of the diaphragm may be useful in identifying patients at high risk of difficulty weaning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- Esteban, 1995, N Engl J Med, 332, 345, 10.1056/NEJM199502093320601 · DOI · Paper page
- Esteban, 1994, Chest, 106, 1188, 10.1378/chest.106.4.1188 · doi:10.1378/chest.106.4.1188
- Khan, 2008, Crit Care Clin, 24, 165, 10.1016/j.ccc.2007.10.004 · DOI
- Herridge, 2008, Crit Care Clin, 24, 179, 10.1016/j.ccc.2007.11.002 · DOI
- Zhu, 2008, Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi, 31, 616
- Vassilakopoulos, 2008, Intensive Care Med, 34, 7, 10.1007/s00134-007-0866-x · DOI
- Maes, 2007, Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 175, 1134, 10.1164/rccm.200609-1342OC · DOI
- Schild, 2008, Pneumologie, 62, 33, 10.1055/s-2007-980137 · doi:10.1055/s-2007-980137
- Helzel, 1985, Rontgenblatter, 38, 248
- Fedullo, 1992, Chest, 102, 1683, 10.1378/chest.102.6.1683 · doi:10.1378/chest.102.6.1683
- Houston, 1992, Clin Radiol, 46, 405, 10.1016/S0009-9260(05)80688-9 · DOI
- Gerscovich, 2001, J Ultrasound Med, 20, 597, 10.7863/jum.2001.20.6.597 · DOI · Paper page
- Epelman, 2005, Pediatr Radiol, 35, 661, 10.1007/s00247-005-1433-7 · doi:10.1007/s00247-005-1433-7
- Lloyd, 2006, Spinal Cord, 44, 505, 10.1038/sj.sc.3101889 · doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3101889
- Boussuges, 2009, Chest, 135, 391, 10.1378/chest.08-1541 · DOI · Paper page
- Wait, 1989, J Appl Physiol, 67, 1560, 10.1152/jappl.1989.67.4.1560 · DOI · Paper page
- Summerhill, 2008, Chest, 133, 737, 10.1378/chest.07-2200 · DOI · Paper page
- Yang, 1991, N Engl J Med, 324, 1445, 10.1056/NEJM199105233242101 · DOI · Paper page
- Chao, 2007, Respiratory Care, 52, 159
- Ayoub, 1997, Can J Anaesth, 44, 739, 10.1007/BF03013389 · doi:10.1007/bf03013389
- Lerolle, 2009, Chest, 135, 401, 10.1378/chest.08-1531 · DOI · Paper page
- Houston, 1994, Thorax, 49, 500, 10.1136/thx.49.5.500 · doi:10.1136/thx.49.5.500
Cited by
Evolution of Diaphragm Thickness during Mechanical Ventilation. Impact of Inspiratory Effort
Goligher, E. C., Fan, E., Herridge, M. S., Murray, A., Vorona, S., Brace, D., Rittayamai, N., Lanys, A., Tomlinson, G., Singh, J. M., et al. (2015) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.201503-0620oc · Cited by 608
Umbrello, M., Formenti, P., Longhi, D., Galimberti, A., Piva, I., Pezzi, A., Mistraletti, G., Marini, J. J., & Iapichino, G. (2015) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/s13054-015-0894-9 · Cited by 343
Goligher, E. C., Laghi, F., Detsky, M. E., Farias, P., Murray, A., Brace, D., Brochard, L. J., Bolz, S.-S., Rubenfeld, G. D., Kavanagh, B. P., et al. (2015) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-015-3724-2 · Cited by 315
Farghaly, S., & Hasan, A. A. (2017) · Australian Critical Care · doi:10.1016/j.aucc.2016.03.004 · Cited by 159
Er, B., Simsek, M., Yildirim, M., Halacli, B., Ocal, S., Ersoy, E. O., Demir, A. U., & Topeli, A. (2021) · Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106503 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, W. Y., Suh, H. J., Hong, S.-B., Koh, Y., & Lim, C.-M.
- Venue
- Critical Care Medicine
- Published
- 2011-12
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2627-2630
- ISSN
- 0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2317417416
- Cited by
- 550
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diaphragm dysfunction assessed by ultrasonography: Influence on weaning from mechanical ventilation*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/ccm.0b013e3182266408
- The paper
- Kim, W. Y., Suh, H. J., Hong, S.-B., Koh, Y., & Lim, C.-M. (2011). Diaphragm dysfunction assessed by ultrasonography: Influence on weaning from mechanical ventilation*. Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0b013e3182266408
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.