Cited by 287Healthcare Operations and Scheduling OptimizationEmergency and Acute Care StudiesRespiratory Support and Mechanisms

ICU Occupancy and Mechanical Ventilator Use in the United States*

Open access
Wunsch, Hannah, Wagner, Jason, Herlim, Maximilian, Chong, David H., Kramer, Andrew A., Halpern, Scott D.·2013·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Detailed data on occupancy and use of mechanical ventilators in U. S. ICU over time and across unit types are lacking. We sought to describe the hourly bed occupancy and use of ventilators in U.S. ICUs to improve future planning of both the routine and disaster provision of intensive care. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. We calculated mean hourly bed occupancy in each ICU and hourly bed occupancy for patients on mechanical ventilators. We assessed trends in overall occupancy over the 3 years. We also assessed occupancy and mechanical ventilation rates across different types and sizes of ICUs. SETTING: Ninety-seven U.S. ICUs participating in Project IMPACT from 2005 to 2007. PATIENTS: A total of 226,942 consecutive admissions to ICUs. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Over the 3 years studied, total ICU occupancy ranged from 57.4% to 82.1% and the number of beds filled with mechanically ventilated patients ranged from 20.7% to 38.9%. There was no change in occupancy across years and no increase in occupancy during influenza seasons. Mean hourly occupancy across ICUs was 68.2% ± 21.3% (SD) and was substantially higher in ICUs with fewer beds (mean, 75.8% ± 16.5% for 5-14 beds vs 60.9% ± 22.1% for 20+ beds, p = 0.001) and in academic hospitals (78.7% ± 15.9% vs 65.3% ± 21.3% for community not-for-profit hospitals, p < 0.001). More than half of ICUs (53.6%) had 4+ beds available more than half the time. The mean percentage of ICU patients receiving mechanical ventilation in any given hour was 39.5% (± 15.2%), and a mean of 29.0% (± 15.9%) of ICU beds were filled with a patient on a ventilator. CONCLUSIONS: Occupancy of U.S. ICUs was stable over time, but there is uneven distribution across different types and sizes of units. Only three of 10 beds were filled at any time with mechanically ventilated patients, suggesting substantial surge capacity throughout the system to care for acutely critically ill patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ccm.0b013e318298a139

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The proportion of mechanically ventilated patients (40%) was fairly representative of the national average of ICU beds receiving mechanical ventilation.

    “However, the mechanically ventilated population (40%) was fairly representative of the national average of ICU beds receiving mechanical ventilation.34”

    From Feasibility of a virtual reality intervention in the intensive care unit (2021) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Results section (‘Use of mechanical ventilation’; page not provided) reports that a mean of 39.5% of ICU patients were mechanically ventilated, supporting the cited 40% patient proportion. But it reports that 29.0% of ICU beds were occupied by ventilated patients, so 40% does not match the paper’s bed-based average. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wunsch, H., Wagner, J., Herlim, M., Chong, D. H., Kramer, A. A., & Halpern, S. D.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (US)
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2013-12
Volume
41
Issue
12
Pages
2712-2719
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2050845046
Cited by
287
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
19.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (K08HS018406)
  • National Institute on Aging (K08AG038477)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024156)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Keywords
ICU bed occupancy, mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit, surge capacity, academic vs community hospitals, influenza season, disaster preparedness, project impact, critically ill patients
MeSH terms
Academic Medical Centers, Adult, Aged, Bed Occupancy, Female, Hospitals, Community, Hospitals, Voluntary, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Length of Stay, Male, Middle Aged, Respiration, Artificial, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review