Cited by 1Cultural Competency in Health CareMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsUsability and User Interface Design

A New Methodological Approach to Cultural Adaptation of a Mobile Application for Teaching the Nursing Process

de Oliveira Salgado, Patricia, Keenan, Gail M., Chianca, Tânia Couto Machado, Macieira, Tamara G. R.·2025·CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/cin.0000000000001306

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Oliveira Salgado, P., Keenan, G. M., Chianca, T. C. M., & Macieira, T. G. R.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
Venue
CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing
Published
2025-03-31
Volume
43
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 1538-2931 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-9774
OpenAlex
W4409013784
Cited by
1
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
1.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CIN Computers Informatics Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
cultural adaptation, mobile application, nursing process, nursing education, educational technology, methodological approaches

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review